‘Doing Good’: Not as Easy as It Seems

May 18, 2018 General Insights, Philanthropically, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Imagine you are a ‘special kind of therapist’. Good. All kinds of people come by your place with a ‘problem’ and they leave with a sense of relief, glad they came along.

After a while they come back and then the same phenomenon occurs. Friendly faces. Nothing to worry about. ‘Doing good’ seems evident.

Is everything okay?

But let us look a little bit deeper now

(because you are a ‘special kind of therapist’) and what might we see? All kinds of things are possible. For example: people turn to you with a smoking addiction and they immediately get a few cigarettes from you and a good stock of the white thingies. Hm. They leave relieved and are glad they came along. Friendly faces. Everything is okay?

Or more generally: people come with a general addiction and you immediately give something general and also a good stock of generality … Hm. You see: why they come and how they leave gets a different meaning because of this, or not? (You can reread this paragraph later on.)

How far should one go?

How deep should one go?

Lots of serious addicts start their pernicious career with hard drugs… on prescription.

Addiction to superficiality knows many adepts within health care. Their high priest is called ‘Placebo’.

How far should one go?

Were missionaries ‘correct’ by being contrary to the culture of indigenous populations? Or do we see thing ‘more correct’ if we notice that just a lot of problems were the result of it?

Somewhat (but not overly) generalizing, one can say: a weight-reducing diet ‘works’, but it is usually a pendulum that returns stronger than it left. Is ‘helping’ someone at following a weight-reducing diet, ‘doing good’? Not evident.

A lot of alternative medicines are, in theory, clearly based on nothing.

Is this innocent? Or do the people who feel helped eventually end up in a negative spiral?

The latter is quite possible.

It’s even likely.

Is it worth it?

It cannot be said more powerfully than reality itself does it.

It’s not because someone laughs, that it is clear that ‘the good has been done’ for that person.

It might even be the case that in the meantime for this person something entirely different is being done.

It’s possible!

And it has so often been the case. Hiding our head in the sand concerning this matter, would be inappropriate.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Glossary

Several of these terms are specific to AURELIS. If you want some AURELIS-specific term explained, please email us at lisa@aurelis.org . Active acceptance: Embracing one’s experiences and emotions fully without resistance, facilitating inner peace and personal growth. Active placebo: An active placebo itself has (side) effects (unlike a passive placebo). To the extent that the Read the full article…

Importance of Clarity

Even more important, especially in the domain of AURELIS: striving for clarity, each one doing the best (s)he can. Vagueness out? Some find vagueness OK for being able to bring people together where this would otherwise not easily be possible. People can stand behind the same vague idea, so at least they meet, mentally or Read the full article…

Synchronicity

For instance, you think about contacting someone who just happens to contact you. The concept of synchronicity has been developed by psychiatrist C.G. Jung in the early 1900s. Most scientists of today don’t believe in it. Let’s try to open this. Definition “Synchronicity is a phenomenon in which people interpret two separate – and seemingly Read the full article…

Translate »