55. Making medicine 80% cheaper? No problem

January 27, 2018 Health & Healing, Sticky Thoughts No Comments

Health is money (and vice versa). At least, that seems to be the message if you read the world in a pharmaceutical company’s handbook. The problem is that money is to many people still a rather scarce commodity. In the US, 30% of personal bankruptcies are due to the out-of-own-pocket costs of medical care. In addition to this, the state-supported safety net gnaws away at the budget of many nations.

◊◊◊

Looking at this world and its peculiar division of all kinds of commodities, this really becomes quite a problem. Making medicine 80% cheaper would in the light of all this, not be a bad thing to do. What then if it were obvious to you (as it is to me) that this endeavor can be accomplished right now?

◊◊◊

Would you say: I don’t care?

◊◊◊

If not, then let me explain how I come to my 80%.

◊◊◊

It’s a well-known secret in the proper milieus that if you put all present-day medication together, the true placebo-effect accounts for more than half of the total effect. For simplicity’s sake, take 50%. In other words, half of the effect is due to the ‘inner strength’ of the person who takes the medication. That is: medication is not needed for this, if you find the proper means to reach that ‘inner strength’ in another way. Getting to this, one can also envision that in half of the cases, medication (and its cost and side effects) will not be first choice anymore.

◊◊◊

Moreover, this ‘inner strength’ is of course to be used preventively as well. Meaning that with proper use, even the need for any possible medication will be inexistent in many cases where it leads to huge costs today. My guess is that this can take care of another 30%. Together: 80%. Again: if you find the proper means to reach ‘inner strength’ in another way. Well…

◊◊◊

That’s what I have been doing for quite some years now.

I’ve named it ‘autosuggestion’.

◊◊◊

In the AURELIS® project, I’ve put together a lot of domains for which I have developed autosuggestion techniques in what I think to be a very sensible, completely non-aggressive and open way. Together, they encompass a field that is at least as wide as that of all medication together. So: an answer is here. Now.

◊◊◊

Do you think this is self-promotion?

I don’t mean to and I don’t care.

◊◊◊

It’s very good that we have all the wonderful medication that has been developed lately. Therefore, let’s use it well. But: ‘more is better’ is not the case here. Moderation is better. The best cure by far, is the patient himself.

◊◊◊

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Bringing the Mind to Medical Science

Medical science increasingly recognizes the influence of the mind, yet still excludes it from its core scientific models. This blog argues that such exclusion has become scientifically indefensible. By taking rationality, depth, and coherence seriously together (as in Rationality (+ Depth) + Coherence = Science), the inclusion of the mind emerges not as an option, Read the full article…

Only Truth Can Truly Cure

No, I have not suddenly become the most arrogant person on Earth. I only think that science does indeed matter. Of course, to “know the final truth” is to be deluded. Ultimate truth may never be attainable. [see: “What is Ultimate Truth?”] The title is rather an admonition. We can strive for truth, discarding what Read the full article…

Symbolic Healthcare

Concerning the mind, healthcare has always been covertly symbolic, and it still is. Now is the time to make it overt. About symbolism Symbolism is a straightforward communication with subconceptual mental patterns, unlike using an analogy. [see: “Symbols and Signs“] In many cases, the use of symbolism is pretty undifferentiated. This is enough for the Read the full article…

Translate »