40. In search of the button that says ‘change’

January 18, 2018 Sticky Thoughts No Comments

If only people were robots… there would be buttons at their backs, reading ‘change’. Push the button and there you go. Brave new world!

◊◊◊

But it’s not this world, for the time being. Still, there is a general idea that change really is as simple as that. The idea is not backed up by experience of course. Still, it’s omnipresent. As is the quest for the right button(s).

◊◊◊

Example: after 10 different painkillers and 20 serious side effects to relieve her psychosomatic back aches, Mrs. Robinson is sitting in front of her newest medic, hearing and believing that this new painkiller from across the ocean will this time be the promised magical wand, potion, pill, button, whatever.

◊◊◊

Second example: at the same time, ten blocks further, Mr Robinson has again the fright of his life. He has a close encounter of the third-hand kind with his own spider phobia, for which he has been treated twice with behavioral therapy. It went well for a while, but now it’s worse than ever before. Of course, Mr. Robinson is not alone in this. It happens frequently.

◊◊◊

The problem is: there are no easy buttons that really make one easily change.

◊◊◊

Which brings us to the why. If only people were robots, I mean, of a cheap brand… there would not be this problem. But they aren’t. It’s about time they also acknowledge the fact and the consequences. Human mind is not a warehouse of thoughts. It’s much more complex than that. Beneath the thoughts lies a whole world. An ‘invisible’ world. How this can be, is easy to explain. Look at one of your own fingers now…

◊◊◊

What you see, is a finger, right? What you also see, if you look closer, is a lot of little wrinkles (at least I do), colors, shades, movement, etc. Now look at your hand. You see a hand, but you also see an overwhelming amount of small details. It’s impossible to be conscious of all this at the same time. You’re only conscious of your ‘hand’ as such because you’re not at the same time conscious of all the details. In this, you have also just discovered how human ‘vision’ principally works: through making good use of its own limitations.

◊◊◊

Now in your mind’s eye, if you are looking at one of your own thoughts, you are looking at a tremendous lot of processing going on at the neuronal level. It is utterly, completely impossible to have all this processing in your conscious attention at the same time, the more so because it all comes ‘from inside out’. Actually, you perceive a thought within your awareness because you don’t see all the underlying ‘details’.

◊◊◊

When mind is involved, this is what makes change so difficult. With only a handful or, say, 1000.000 thoughts on the go, the buttons would be easy to find (and shortly after that also manufactured). Unfortunately for the Robinsons, it was not meant to be.

◊◊◊

And isn’t it wonderful? Humans are infinitely much more interesting than that. Each of us is a world (not to say: a universe!) of wonders, poetry, depth of humanity. For a long time to come, let mind astonish its researchers in its sheer infinity of levels of complexity. That’s great.

Please follow and like us:
LinkedIn
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
Follow by Email
SHARE

Related Posts

5. Yummy yummy, Mr. Pavlov, yummy yummy

Pavlov took a dog and gave him food (unconditioned stimulus = UCS) paired with the sound of a bell. After a while, the sound of the bell (conditioned stimulus = CS) gave the same response as the UCS, namely: drooling. Pavlov considered his dog conditioned very well. He and others showed again and again this Read the full article…

69. Getting that wonderful sea-feeling

“We look at things and see ourselves.” ◊◊◊ This phrase is nonsense of course, but then again: not completely. For instance, there is more information coming from the brain to the eye than vice versa. If you look at it this way then the eye itself, nothing more than the first stage of vision, is Read the full article…

41. Emptiness!

Dear reader, let me take you on a journey to Emptiness. No, I have not suddenly become a fan of nothingness or nihilism. Neither did I invent/discover the concept of Emptiness. I’m too late for that. It was already invented/discovered some 1800 years ago by an Indian guy called Nagaryuna. Thanks to him, it became Read the full article…