Who Needs Placebos?

August 19, 2023 Placebo No Comments

“If a caregiver prescribes or uses a placebo with love, he should know that the placebo is probably not needed anymore. The love is enough.”

The above is quoting myself at a congress (Montreal, 2011). I still mean it as I did back then. Love (or Compassion) may be more potent than any placebo in many cases.

Let’s keep the definition straight.

The American Society of Pain Management Nursing defines a placebo as “any sham medication or procedure designed to be void of any known therapeutic value.” (*) Thus, placebo is a lie ― by definition, if we reserve the term for that, as I did at the famous placebo congress.

In this sense, the placebo effect is not just any kind of expectation effect. The latter frequently cannot be avoided. For instance, anything a physician does can have an implicit ‘placebo effect,’ which can then – avoiding the negative connotation of deception – better be called the ‘expectation effect.’

If the expectation is explicitly induced, we are closer to the placebo, even if done with good intentions. At best, it’s a ‘white lie.’ At worst, it’s a lie that is not deontologically acceptable since it’s irreconcilable with the (more and more juridically pertinent) rule of informed consent: a doctor must speak the truth to his patients except if this would have inhumane consequences.

Make love, not placebo?

In a professional sense, yes. Let’s talk about Compassion (as ‘empathy beyond’) rather than love. Of course, we need to make a strict distinction here between placebo and empathy.

A caregiver who treats his clients/patients with much Compassion may need to prescribe significantly less placebo. This is another reason why to use the placebo as little as possible. In a placebo-less setting, the urge to be Compassionate may be more at the forefront since it’s all there is in the toolkit.

This way also, in a broader perspective, the ubiquitous use of placebo may have kept medical practice as well as science away from delving head-on into empathy. This is detrimental to clients/patients and society in the long term. It’s a case of outer strength replacing Inner Strength.

There is a long path to travel in the universe of empathy/Compassion. Relatively little has been accomplished until now. That’s why I envision a congress about empathy in the healthcare domain, bringing together international experts and making a significant step in research and deployment.

Then, who needs placebos?

This should be at the choice of the cared-for as part of informed consent. Of course, the placebo doesn’t work in openness ― as I have proven in a recently submitted article.

I’m tenacious, am I not?

Meanwhile, the lie is non-science, and placebo-as-a-lie must go.

Humanly, caregivers may – implicitly and explicitly – play with expectations. However, the necessary condition for doing so must be that they learn more about what the placebo entails. Certainly, I mean with this much more than the meagerly one hour in seven years of medical studies as is generally done ― and even so, it’s about placebo groups in medical studies to ‘prove’ the effectiveness of healthcare treatments in double-blind studies.

“We don’t need no thought control.”

Yeah, Pink Floyd comes to the rescue. Thanks. Good insight!

As to placebo-as-a-lie, one can see it as thought control, a manipulation of the thoughts of someone in dire need ― being most gullible, which is a reason why the placebo is effective in its own way. Something is active, but it’s the receiver’s mind.

The latter also shows who’s in the driver’s seat, eventually ― not the placebo itself. So, to avoid accidents on the road to better health, it’s better to be open ― not to cover the driver’s eyes with a few pills or procedures.

It’s even better to teach the driver to drive better.

Does AURELIS come to mind?

Does Lisa?

(*) Arnstein P, Broglio K, Wuhrman E, Kean MB. Use of placebos in pain management. Pain Manag Nurs Off J Am Soc Pain Manag Nurses. 2011 Dec;12(4):225–9.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Psychotherapy and Placebo

To the degree that psychotherapy amounts to placebo, we may need to rethink it. Placebo >< depth The concept ‘placebo’ is used here in the sense of deception. [see: “Placebo Without Deception?”] It’s crucial to make a full distinction with the concept of empathy. [see: “Landscape of Empathy”] I clarified the difference in [see: “Empathy Read the full article…

Placebo Without Deception?

By definition impossible if one takes ‘deception’ as a necessary characteristic of the concept of placebo. Still, it’s worthwhile to take a closer look at the ethical side. Preliminary remarks This text is rather academic. The train of thought is interesting for all. This is not about empathy, but only about ‘the sugar pill that Read the full article…

About < Placebo> In-Depth

In-depth, placebo shows a direction to explore with different means and towards greater humanity. [see: My favorite video about placebo on YouTube.] The term ‘placebo’ More interesting than bickering about terms is a clarification of concepts. This also makes one think more deeply about what is significant enough to warrant different concepts. [see: “Placebo: I Read the full article…

Translate »