The Religious Feeling – What Religion Has Always Been About
The religious feeling lives deeply inside and everywhere. It is ubiquitous and invisible. It can be supported and downplayed without anyone’s knowing. It is very much Open.
What I dare say
One can have full-blown religious feeling without believing anything conceptual. There is no need to lose anything of this feeling by ‘not believing.’
The question is about conceptuality.
One can keep one’s religion of birth. There is no need to relinquish it. There is no need to stay with it for the religious feeling to flourish.
Anxiety has no place.
What I dare even say
Conceptual belief can stand in the way of full-blown religious feeling. What one can deem of the highest importance in religion can sometimes better be served by not believing anything conceptual.
Of course, this is mysticism.
The thing is:
One can lose one’s conceptual belief and not lose anything worthwhile. Many people can do so. Humanity can do so.
One can read some Holy Book, get deeply immersed in it, see it as purely symbolic, and not lose anything worthwhile.
The reason why people don’t
The reason why people don’t is the general basic illusion of living an X-dimensional life whereas reality is (X+1)-dimensional at least. In the +1 additional dimension, one can make contact towards inside. This is the way towards God in any case, no matter how one experiences religion. I mean: anything that is anyhow a path toward anything.
Not being merely 2-dimensional characters on paper.
COVID
The same illusion makes people blind to a profoundly physical influence from inside, even if it throws them in a societal whirlpool of unnecessary disease and death.
Including huge economic havoc.
Also, the same anxiety has no place, even though it’s everywhere.
It may not be the most popular thing to say, but the whole world is suffering right now through a lack of religious feeling. This, while the world is still inundated with a flood of contradictory religions of many makings, ages, places, concepts, and whatever. This alone should ring a bell
of a uniquely different church.
We can do better
Religion could help in the sense of ‘true religious feeling.’ This could guide people like a path being traveled upon, as well as constructed while traveling. Responsibly religious people could take the lead. It would be nice for them to cultivate, themselves, the religious feeling.
Yes, even the Pope.
Or is it asked too much that someone who dedicates his life to religion grows in the same?
Is such growing ever finished, even while taking the risk of finding oneself – sometimes suddenly – in a distinct space of religious feeling?
Related Posts
Opening Religions — Meaningfully
Opening religions – this is, the Open Religion endeavor – should lead to more deeper meaningfulness — certainly not less. Organized religions typically provide deep meaningfulness through storytelling. That is their main strength and also their main problem — not in the storytelling itself but through the frequently mistaken unification of the story and reality. Read the full article…
Triangle of Religion
This triangle is a ‘landscape of religion’ at a conceptual level, showing ‘Open Religion’ as part of this landscape. This is all very conceptual. Concrete religions or ‘ways to experience religion’ are situated somewhere within the triangle, not therefore at the corners or sides. Three corners of the triangle Within the triangle, you see a Read the full article…
Humanism with a Vengeance
Humanism: ‘man is the measure of all things.’ Vengeance: this is about the total human being – partly conscious, mostly nonconscious. Many faces of humanism, yesterday and today Among them, I see ‘humanism’ as what puts human being at the forefront, thus not – apart from human being – any organization: no religion, no politics, Read the full article…