Does ‘Salam’ Mean Submission or Peace?

December 1, 2023 Open Religion No Comments

To me, there are two fundamentally different kinds of Muslims according to this distinction.

‘Salam,’ as in Islam and Muslim ― same root, also as ‘sjalom’ in Hebrew.

I intend no denigration of Islam or any other religion.

Every religion is worthwhile if one dares to fall deeply inside. Otherwise, it’s just a sociocultural happening. There is no harm in that if there is clarity about the quality of religious content.

By the way, mine is Open Religion. Please respect it as I respect yours. Also, I don’t want to proselytize, just to let you think and feel for yourself.

Are you Open Religious?

Inner peace, a universal good

With this at the forefront, one can only applaud. A religion that brings inner peace to all is a mature one — as I would say, ready for the next step to being Open.

Inner peace is the aim of Compassion, basically. It is the most valuable good.

Moreover, it is incompatible with the coerced submission of anyone to anyone else.

Submission?

There is no room for oppression in any genuine religion, including Islam. Nevertheless, some see ‘salam’ as the submission of the true believer to ‘God’ who apparently demands such submission.

A discussion about whether such a God exists is, of course, pointless to a submitted believer because it’s not, to him, about rational arguments and logical argumentation. Anyway, a religious belief is a feeling; therefore, it is explicitly not an end product of mere rationality.

So, submission or peace?

The incompatibility that I just referred to lives on the outside. As ‘coerced submission,’ it’s in no case something from the inside.

That’s where I make the big difference — or unity.

Submission from the inside?

Indeed.

What this means is that the ego lowers its walls to make room for the total person in two directions. This is needed for any genuine religiosity in the first place.

I know this feeling very well, also in a religious context. I know it as one of the most excellent things if there is no coercion involved. Bring one grain of that, and all may be lost.

This way, genuine submission and inner peace point to the same.

No argument about this. Just go for it and feel it yourself.

So please don’t make the surface-level mistake of discarding depth, even if this mistake seems to be made so frequently in this world in which religion serves to many as a means for ego-purposes, be it in this world or the next.

In the universe of religion, mere ego-purposes are an utter disgrace. I wonder why this is not evident to some.

Respect your religiosity.

Then, our souls may meet.

What eternal joy!

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

The End of NOMA

‘Non-Overlapping MAgisteria’ (NOMA) is the traditional division between science and religion. Did it ever truly work as claimed? It still mainly seems to enable scientists to artificially keep their religion while knowing better. ‘Non-overlapping’ So, this used to be the pretension: that they don’t overlap at all — therefore, have nothing to say one about Read the full article…

Spiritual Leadership

Enthusiasm: theos = ‘god’. | Inspiration: spirit = ‘deeper mind’. ‘Spiritual leadership’ is what leadership has always been about. Consciousness unexplained Since ages, people have sought explanations for that what comes from their deeper self into consciousness – what one is consciously aware of – . No mental conscious content (thought, feeling, emotion…) originates in Read the full article…

Eyes of Soul

People have been looking for ‘God’ everywhere outside themselves. Then also inside themselves. Contrary to both, ‘eyes of soul’ points to the looking itself. Something When people use the term ‘God’, all you can know for certain – well, more or less – is that they use the term ‘God’. Apparently, they use it to Read the full article…

Translate »