Every Open Leader’s Final Goal is Global
At any level, the Open goal is the global goal ― yes, the world, at least. There is no contradiction in this, but a mindset and a challenge – for the Open leader – to bring goals together in mutually strengthening ways.
The final goal may be so far away that it looks like it doesn’t make any difference.
Yet, it does.
The issue is the leader’s Open mindset. Then, from the leader’s Open stance and actions, eventually, everybody’s mindset. Open Leadership is about an Open mindset toward inside and outside, both to a considerable degree. This naturally evolves toward having the globe as the final goal. It’s part of the Open Leadership deal. You want Open Leadership? You get the global goal.
Furthermore, thinking from global to local and thinking from local to local are crucially different. At least, it makes one prone to see other issues and opportunities. Thus, the global goal eventually makes a positive difference locally.
What about local versus global interests?
It feels natural for a leader to defend his group against other groups. In evolutionary terms, the survival of the strongest leads to leaders who make their groups – absolutely or relatively – stronger. The reverse seems contra-natural.
No naiveté ― Indeed, this is a challenge one should take seriously.
Yet <the local versus the less local> has always been an issue. Each group may have subgroups. In the best case, the group leader brings the subgroups together and shows, one way or another, that it is in their interests to integrate themselves into the larger group. Meanwhile, the different identities of subgroups must not be eradicated. An Open Leader strives to diminish tensions in this regard. No person should feel like losing something profoundly important.
What about individual competition?
Competition – in money, assets, status, ideas, etc. – is arguably the primary motivator in a capitalist-liberal society. Motivating people one way or another is also arguably most important for running any other kind of society.
Can competing groups strive for a common global goal?
Not easily. That’s why we need Open Leadership in this ever more complex and global worldly village. Open Leadership relaxes head-on zero-sum competition and, therefore, needs to put something in place. The result may be a gradual shift toward a post-capitalist society. My candidate for the substitute, following Open Leadership, is Compassion.
No naiveté ― For a starter, it is not Compassionate to let oneself be competed out of business.
Therefore, one should integrate competition into the global goal.
This can be done by bringing some notions of global goals into the competitive framework, thereby transforming the local level. Part of the effort lies in Opening coworkers, at first toward inside. Then, from the inside out, Open Leadership can strengthen Compassionate competition toward oneself or others and let it strengthen ever broader circles.
The mason then doesn’t chisel on some stone but is building a cathedral.
This Inner Strength dissolves into people and society, making everything and everyone stronger. New opportunities to thrive arise at every level, including the local.
No naiveté ― This makes many things more challenging, requiring much effort, insight, and experience.
Isn’t it great?
Related Posts
Female-Friendly in Open Leadership
A woman should feel free to show she is a woman, not only in her appearance but also in her way of doing. She shouldn’t feel urged to take up a male way of doing things. Why is it more difficult for a woman to get to the top? In principle, this can have many Read the full article…
From Bullishness to Leadership
A broad view upon bullying points to true leadership as what is needed to diminish bullishness. There is more to bullying than a bully and a bullied. There is a whole group, even a culture showing a ‘degree of bullishness.’ The actual bully is a symptom of this as much as of his own personal Read the full article…
Everyone Wants You to Be ‘the Best’!
Fortunately, people are easily satisfied. Human perfection lives in imperfection. In the first place in a leader. A leader can hold on to the idea that everything he does is ‘perfect’ anyway, just because he simply is the leader. Such a character accepts no contradiction because that would undermine his leadership position. Clearly: if the Read the full article…