What’s New in Meditation

August 27, 2018 Meditation No Comments

I would say: everything. Meditation IS about the new. Even ‘always the same’ is always new.

People have been meditating for ages.

Way before for instance the start of Christianity, or even Judaism. Meditation is ancient.

Still, new (to many) in meditation is that meditation IS the new itself. At every moment again: the new. I say ‘the new’ even though meditation is an action.

‘The new’ is an action.

I put it this way to make it a bit disconcerting. Which it is, eventually. Which it better be from the start. If you think “I’m going to meditate again,” then it’s as if you take the same object again – a statue of Buddha? – and put it on the same cushion.

You cannot meditate twice the same meditation.

You cannot even meditate twice the same few seconds of meditation.

Like you cannot eat twice ‘the same apple’ even though you can eat ‘an apple’ many times.

Trying to meditate well is precisely that: not striving to do twice the same. Letting go (your urge of control). Letting come (from inside you) whatever comes. That it’s always so very new (= also ‘unexpected’) shows that

your inner landscape is vast.

Actually, it’s extremely vast.

Meditation serves a good purpose of making contact with this vastness and inviting it to be-more-itself. This way, the meditator as a whole can be more himself and at the same time ‘grow’.

This vastness has been intuited by meditators since the beginning. It is now being acknowledged by Western science through scientific experimentations and neuro-cognitive insights. Scientists such as David Eagleman* compare the ‘vastness of the universe within’ to that outside. We used to think that there were only the visible stars quite nearby. Now we know there are a billion times more stars – and complete galaxies – a billion times further away.

And we don’t yet see the end of it.

New associations within the vastness are spontaneous, organic

like an organism sprouting and growing. A bit like a plant with many roots, each searching its own way. In addition, these ‘inner roots’ also make many connections to each other to form patterns of all kinds within your vastness.

The comparison with ‘organic life’ is of course not even a comparison: Your inner life is natural from a to z. There is nothing mechanical about it, although many tend to think of it in that way: the nonconscious being just a number of straightforward instincts and reflexes, or a bunch of Freudian, repressed material that can be brought to consciousness if it were not for something like ‘repression’. Reality is hugely more complex, as well as plainly different.

Meditative associations are ‘original’

in the sense that they come ‘from the source’ – your nonconscious – and thus are also fresh and new. They also feel ‘new’ because to your brain (thus also ‘mind’) they are. The experience of ‘newness’ is itself closer to the ‘origin’ as when you encounter ‘something new’ in the world outside yourself.

I acknowledge that this last is not so easy to understand. Maybe you don’t. Unfortunately, it’s also not so easy (for me) to explain.

I guess it’s an experience that you have to, well, experience. Personally, I feel it very much from inside.

I guess that mainly, you’ll also have to experience it from inside…

by meditating.

 

*A very good book – comprehensible and scientific at the same time – from David Eagleman is ‘The Brain – The Story of You’. I absolutely recommend it.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Goal of Meditation

Mostly said: meditation has no goal. What is meant: no conceptual one. Then why meditate? The goal is non-conceptual ethics. (This is not an easy text.) Spiraling inwards Morality: the relief of suffering. [see: ‘Morality Is the Relief of Suffering’] Which is related to why people do what they do, their motivation. Which is related Read the full article…

Is Meditation Selfish?

Meditation is the opposite of ego-selfishness. Even more, they are incompatible. Theravada, Mahayana These are the two biggest strands in worldwide Buddhism. Mahayana may have been mainly developed historically as a reaction to what people saw as the Theravada monk’s ‘selfish’ attitude: the arhat who meditates especially to reach Nirvana for himself. Of course, this Read the full article…

Simply Beautiful

Eventually, what is beautiful is simple. Also when this beauty is surrounded by complexity. Simplicity in beauty Beauty doesn’t necessarily mean ‘not much’. It always means ‘not too much’. At least, no superfluous complexity is standing in the way. So as much as possible, beauty can flow where it wants. According to me, beauty is Read the full article…

Translate »