Depth is Formless Meaning

September 6, 2018 Cognitive Insights, Meditation No Comments

Forms are meaningless. Meaning is formless.

You may like money or status

But what really motivates you, is the liking. Money doesn’t mean anything by itself. Status doesn’t mean anything without your liking it.

And eventually, you cannot consciously decide to be motivated. You cannot consciously decide to ‘like’.

Try it if you, well… like to. And see: this very liking also is not a conscious decision. Whether you like it or not, it’s always so. You – or anyone/anything else – can invite, not decide for you to like anything. It comes spontaneously from deeper inside you. It comes from the realm where ‘deeper meaning’ resides. The flow of the latter is your liking (or disliking).

But:

the deeper you go into this realm of meaning, the more ‘forms’ dissolve.

E.g. you like money. Why?

Because what you can buy with it.

Why do like to buy this?

Because it means something to… But why?

Why… why… why…?

At some point, you don’t know it anymore.

Some of this not-knowing may be because it’s hidden (Freudian). But there’s much more: eventually, you don’t find it because it’s not as such findable.

It has non-shape meaning.

In Mahayana-Buddhism, it’s said to be ‘emptiness’ (sunyata). This is not plainly empty (void, vacuum). It’s – within that tradition – something like “Form is emptiness. Emptiness is form,” while at the same time “There is no emptiness. There is no form.”

No one said this would be easy.

I see it – with my Western, rational eye – as ‘subconceptual processing’: mental, pattern-wise but by far not having clear forms (concepts). Moreover, it’s quite gradual. Something like:

You’re in a deep mist.

Then you see a shape approaching.

There’s something going on but you don’t know what it is.

Ah. It’s a man. No, it’s a gorilla!

Ah. It’s a nice gorilla.

He wants a banana from you. You give him a banana.

Everybody’s happy.

Sub-conceptual

Because of this ‘formless’ quality, it’s difficult to define depth. It’s sub-conceptual. So. Try to use concepts… Difficult.

At the same time, this sub-conceptual realm (or sunyata) is the source of all our concepts at any moment of thinking. We continuously live in a huge mist. All kinds of ‘gorillas’ appear. However, never does an entity appear by magic, right before your nose. Each time, they emerge from the fog.

The comparison gets weirder. The mist is always kind of solipsistic. Entities may come from ‘outside’ or ‘inside’ but:

they always appear within you.

Most of all, your motivations.

Just as you cannot decide for a gorilla to appear in your mist, you cannot decide for a motivation to appear in your mist.

Even not, if you are sitting down now, a motivation to stand up. As conscious and knowingly the motivation may appear to you, it’s not.

However, you’re absolutely not lost in this mist.

You are this mist.

Meditation is about experiencing this directly.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Quality of Depth

Most people would agree that ‘quality of depth’ is profoundly relevant to them personally. At the same time, many may disagree about what it entails. It’s a challenging concept. It’s already challenging to grasp ‘human depth’ since subconceptual processing – therefore also the difficulty to conceptually get it – is an inextricable feature. ‘Deep’ itself Read the full article…

Always Avoidance, Always Attraction

From bacteria onwards, life has been about avoidance and attraction. This is still the case within the human being, including the mind. Depending on this, we heal or become sick. The mental-neuronal level As neurocognitive science increasingly shows, our ‘universe inside’ contains a myriad of mental-neuronal patterns. [see: “Patterns in Neurophysiology“] These are activated and Read the full article…

Subconscious is Dead. Long Live Non-Conscious!

‘The subconscious’ stems from the Freudian take that some conscious-like thing lurks in the mind behind a fence of repression, ready to jump forward or wreak havoc from behind the fence. Contrary to this, the non-conscious is just plain and hard modern cognitive neuroscience. Freud still engenders much resistance. Putting this in history, let’s go Read the full article…

Translate »