17. Antidepressants: doors wide shut

January 17, 2018 Health & Healing, Sticky Thoughts No Comments

Antidepressants have not been invented. They have been discovered. It happened through people taking drugs for another purpose. Some of these reported a diminishment in feelings of depression.

◊◊◊

As one says, the rest is history.

◊◊◊

Looking closer at it, the aim of that what has been discovered, is to indiscriminately diminish the suffering. How this is brought about, is not the topic of this text (although ‘evil tongues’ dare suggest that the effect is almost entirely through the placebo effect…).

◊◊◊

If I indiscriminately diminish my physical pain sensation, then I get quickly burned, get calluses here and there, get easily injured in all possible ways… I expect the same on the psychological domain.

◊◊◊

Let’s look at deeper mind (‘deeper self’) with the metaphor of a house. If it’s storming, I may be inclined to shut the doors of my house. However, the storm may be meaningful. Moreover, it may have become a storm precisely because I shut the doors when it was still a gentle breeze. Maybe the breeze/storm is just asking for attention?

◊◊◊

If I indiscriminately shut the doors with ‘medication’, I may feel better, but as a consequence I will also lose contact with the storm. I will not learn to cope with it. Therefore I will need to keep the doors shut even more and more. This is: I will become more and more dependent on the medication. After some bad experiences, even lifelong!

◊◊◊

This is not a plea to never shut any doors. It may be better to shut them when the storm could ‘blow your mind out’, so to speak. However, one should know what one is doing. There are many beautiful things outside, such as: the whole world. Even more: the universe.

◊◊◊

Antidepressants have not been invented. So researchers didn’t come to them through rational deduction. They just saw that some people ‘felt better’. In my metaphor, these people may have ‘closed the doors’. Until now, nobody knows what dire consequences an indiscriminate door-shutting can have.

◊◊◊

To me, a treatment that is focused on keeping the doors open as much as possible, seems much more humane. Antidepressants may be part of this, with caution. Mandatory is learning to cope with open doors and therefore with the ‘storm’. This may turn intoa gentle breeze again. Nothing as agreeable as that on a hot and sunny day.

◊◊◊

Mandatory is to get into communication with one’s deeper self, and to get every possible help in doing so.

◊◊◊

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

The Dual Nature of Psychosomatic Illness

Psychosomatic illness appears when mental processes negatively influence physical health. Often misunderstood or oversimplified, these conditions highlight a fascinating frontier of scientific inquiry, bridging mental health and somatic medicine. Of course – and even though ‘psychosomatic’ often carries that connotation – the resulting physical symptoms are not ‘imagined’; they are genuine and often measurable. Changing Read the full article…

The Abuse of ‘Holistic’

The term ‘holistic’ is abused very frequently, very deeply, and very inconsiderately, in many cases meaning something pretty unholistic. A holistic approach looks at the whole person, considering his physical, mental (including emotional), social, and spiritual wellbeing. The focus lies on a person’s wellness, not just his illness. That’s a great start. Away from pure Read the full article…

Proof in a Complex World

Anything human-health-related is prone to complexity ― especially in psycho-somatics. This makes experimental proof challenging, leading to the present situation in which there are still immense gaps in scientific knowledge. Time and again, these gaps are filled by disregarding mental influences while, implicitly or explicitly, referring to a future that will endorse this disregard ― Read the full article…

Translate »