What’s the Secret?

November 13, 2017 General No Comments

Looking for the ‘secret’ can be shallow or very profound. Shallowness shouldn’t close the doors of profound perception.

Shallow = the ‘secret’ as a simple key leading straight towards worldly success, wealth and fame. For instance, through mindlessly, mechanically repeating ‘I want’. A simple mechanism as if oneself were also nothing but a mechanical construct.

This shallowness is a perversion of profundity.

The difference lies in depth of mind. There is no ‘law of attraction’ at the superficial level. Ignoring the deeper part of mind leads to effects opposite to the intended. However, this deeper – unconscious – part is real. Modern science has proven its existence and importance in many ways. Therefore, one shouldn’t try to just swap the ‘secret’ away with a scientific brush… Even though it’s frequently treated in most unscientific ways, one can still try to be as rational as possible in thinking about it.

A profound ‘secret’ can be found in many religions.

In the Egyptian, Greek and Roman mystery religions, the mystery was a ‘secret’. Allah cannot be seen. The Holy Trinity cannot be understood. Hinduism is full of ‘secret’ things, places, wisdoms… The secret is attractive. It draws people’s attention. But then it doesn’t yield.

Many people are looking for this so-called ‘secret’, presupposing that it is something. Otherwise, what’s the purpose?

But the secret is PRECISELY NOT something.

That is what it’s eventually about. It is no-thing. This is very different from nothing. With nothing, there is – well – just nothing. Contrary to this, if you look into no-thing, you see … conceptual ‘emptiness’. This is the way of your own unconscious. Thus the secret attracts because it concerns the deepest within you. You know there is something, even immensely much. Yet you look into ‘emptiness’. More precisely as already said: conceptual emptiness.

The Secret that Cannot be Found, is You.

This ‘secret’ is secret because of it’s being so. It’s not hidden. There is not necessarily someone who doesn’t want you to know it and therefore hides it from you. It’s also not just difficult to be found. It cannot be unveiled. It exists as what cannot be found. Eventually, even ‘something’, being anything at all, is way beyond what ‘secret’ is about.

And that is because it’s about how you ‘think’, how your mind works, how your brain forms mental content. It’s about YOU opening (or not) your mind. Looking at what is a so-called ‘secret’, you look into the emptiness of your mind itself. YOUR thinking makes or un-makes the secret.

Not-knowable because that is the way our mind/brain works.

We do not know the neurons of our brain, nor the patterns that these neurons form in the depth of our mind/brain. They are ‘secret’ by nature not because there is nothing, but because they are at any moment present BEFORE conceptual thinking. Forming conscious thoughts, we lose these pre-patterns. For instance, ‘empathy’ – so very important in many human endeavors – shows that we react to much more than we are consciously aware of. Grabbing it, is losing it. Not grabbing it, is being able to look at it as no-thing, no-thought, no-feeling.

Yet this is the source of what drives us, the eventual source of deep motivation.

Therefore – paradoxically – it is the ‘secret’ that drives towards accomplishing anything: success, health and wellness, growth… if one doesn’t try to grab these from mere shallowness. That would just not be realistic.

There is no surface of any pond without the pond itself.

Please follow and like us:
Follow by Email

Related Posts

About Concepts (From My PhD Thesis)

When talking about the ‘subconceptual’ [see About ‘Subconceptual’], it is also important to understand what is meant by ‘conceptual’. This is not a straightforward discussion. According to the classical view of concepts, the definition of a concept is “a proposition that gives a set of individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for being in the Read the full article…

Three Dangers of Careless Depth

The ‘deeper’ has already led to many accidents. Look at the pitiful excesses of Catholicism. It’s just an example. But that should not be a reason to throw away the ‘deeper’. However, one ought to be particularly careful with it. As a starters, one can make a primary distinction between: BLACK – the ‘deeper’ turns Read the full article…

The Story of Ego

The evolution from ‘I’ into ‘ego’ has been very gradual, as has been the appearance of consciousness. In a way, the latter is central to the former. [see: The Story of ‘I’. The present text is its continuation.] Consciousness has not been developed for the sake of ‘ego’. Nevertheless, it was indispensable for the appearance Read the full article…