The Invisible (Wo)Man

May 24, 2020 General Insights No Comments

What is invisible is invisible. Therefore, it’s invisible.

Let me start with a hallucination

Or whatever you want to call it.

I like ‘vision’ more. Years ago, I was at a meditation retreat for several days. At the end of the third day – always a more decisive one – I kept sitting a while on my own in the zendo where some 20 others and I had spent the day on our cushions.

Yes, I can exaggerate a bit, sometimes.

Then it happened that the others were gone and still there. Vague. Extremely friendly. A bit scary. Beautiful. Present.

In Zen-talk: Buddha-nature.

In AURELIS-talk: deeper self.

  1. You may still call it a hallucination. The point doesn’t lie in the seeing, but the meaningfulness.

The meaning of the invisible

In everyday life, we tend not to see Buddha-nature. However, my hallucination taught me that it’s always there, in everyone, everywhere. In people. In animals. It’s gradual.

This Buddha-nature (or deeper self) = meaning. Whenever you encounter meaning, it’s this. An object may ‘carry meaning,’ but it is not meaning. Meaning is invisible. The meaning-man is an invisible man. You take this out of a human being and you may not see a difference. Yet meaning has gone. I think this is happening more and more over the years.

But that can change.

Did you ever see meaning?

No.

It is invisible because it is invisible, therefore it is invisible. Of course, this way, it will never be visible unless people learn to see. In Buddhism, this is called ‘awakening.’ We can call it a diminishment of dissociation.

This is absolutely needed in all domains of life. Dissociation, the absence of deeper meaningfulness, is the reverse of Compassion. Unfortunately, the invisibleness doesn’t diminish its negative influence, which is also the reverse of Compassion. In short, it hinders human growth. It heightens human suffering.

Peek-a-boo

As long as it cannot be openly seen, it shows itself in weird ways. Conceptualized religion is one of these ways. That is: the most improbably weird stuff can become a ‘carrier of meaning’ because in it, at least, something is visible. It may be completely impossible, defying sanity, with different religions entirely contradicting one another. But as long as it puts something visible on the altar, it will prevail against the invisible. And yet, it is itself a search for meaning. In that sense, religions have helped humanity over the centuries in not altogether losing the invisible.

Fortunately, in a few years time, the invisible will become visible due to advances in technology. This is like a telescope towards inside. As with telescopes towards outside, what we don’t see with bare eyes becomes visible nevertheless, then to become common knowledge. It happened with galaxies and pulsars and black holes; it will happen with ourselves.

Peek-a-boo, here are you!

Meanwhile: disaster

Even in extreme circumstances as we are living now – corona times – invisible man remains invisible. This way, there is a lot of unnecessary suffering and death. Statistics are meaningless without the meaningfulness of the individual person. Otherwise said: there is prose in living. There is poetry in Living. I ask myself: what is living without Living? Is there any sense?

What is man without invisible man? What is woman without invisible woman?

And vice versa?

We are an impossible dream.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Money = Energy

Money is energy in potential form. Just like electricity or wind, its meaning lies in the flow. When it moves, it shapes the world — but whether it nourishes or destroys depends on what it serves. This reflection looks at money as energy that can either dissolve into waste or blossom into meaning. The question Read the full article…

Balance vs. Synthesis

Where a balancing act can be proper, a synthesis can be powerful. In a synthesis, a deeper connection between elements is sought, which may lead to an unforeseen and original direction. A balance is an equilibrium that doesn’t readily invite originality. In many cases, that’s OK, of course. Finding a balance may defuse tensions, enabling Read the full article…

Philosophers vs. Philosophies

Philosophies often begin as living, breathing processes embodied by thinkers who wrestle with the deepest questions of existence. But over time, what was once a dynamic exploration frequently hardens into a fixed system. The philosopher – a person engaged in the ongoing act of questioning – becomes overshadowed by the philosophy, which claims to offer Read the full article…

Translate »