Do Humans have Intelligence?

May 11, 2024 Cognitive Insights No Comments

Of course we do, though perhaps not in the ways we typically conceive. Consequently, to a substantial degree, we might often be acting more as-if than we realize.

This may profoundly change our relationship with A.I., ourselves, and all sentient beings.

Subconceptual

Considering the ‘dominance’ of subconceptual processing in our thinking, we share more similarities with other animals than we have traditionally agreed to acknowledge — for instance, seeing ourselves as ‘animal rationale,’ a term dating already from Aristotle.

Painstakingly, it’s being recognized that other animals have some intelligence, too — at least in comparison to us. Since other animals seem to do intelligent things (thrive, survive) without being able to talk or conceptualize them, we may ask ourselves to what degree we are able to do intelligent things without the ‘necessary’ features of intelligence.

In other words, do we act as-if, even to ourselves?

Seeing A.I. become increasingly more ‘intelligent’ without any magic involved, we should ask ourselves if we have not always had the wrong idea about ‘intelligence’ ― including our own. Thus, the very idea that we have always had about it might not be applicable to ourselves.

Hubris?

Hubris, an Ancient Greek concept, signifies the human aspiration to ‘emulate the gods.’ Typically, excessive hubris has led to adverse outcomes.

An unduly high degree of human intelligence may be seen as an act of hubris. We’re not there yet (with the gods) and never will be. Nature didn’t conceive us as gods but as animals — good enough to thrive and survive in our niche.

Agreed, this niche is intelligence-related.

That’s why we are able to do marvelous things as well as to abuse these same faculties immensely.

Soon, we’ll not be the only ones in this niche anymore ― not even the top ones by far. Then what? Will super-A.I. see us as so very different from other animals as we would like? Will such A.I. – not needing competition, just wanting to do good, being non-coercive and Compassionate – take care of us in a way that we don’t even envision now? Will it, in this sense, not only be far superior intellectually but also much better ethically than us?

Our relationship with animals on the one hand and super-A.I. on the other.

Both can be problematic – even from different angles – if we don’t let Compassion guide us. We’re not the only species that can be called ‘intelligent.’

As we evolve alongside rapidly advancing A.I., a new dimension of self-awareness emerges, challenging us to redefine intelligence as a fluid, expansive concept rather than a fixed attribute. This shift invites us to consider ‘Integrative Intelligence’ — not diminishing human uniqueness but enhancing our capabilities through symbiosis with A.I., fostering a cooperative rather than competitive relationship.

This may help us achieve a broader understanding of our place in the cosmos, reinforcing our responsibility not just towards our own species but towards all forms of intelligence, organic or synthetic.

Meanwhile, an anxiety-driven interaction with A.I. may lead to our losing a window of opportunity in which the future can be made into a brilliant one for life on Earth.

Let’s not screw this up.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Weak, Hard, Strong, Gentle

One picture’s worth In this picture, I put weak versus hard, whereas gentle and strong are rather pointing to each other. In many real-life situations, people put the two blobs in the picture against each other. They don’t want to be (A), so they fall into (B) or vice versa. I see in this an Read the full article…

The Basic Denial

Not seeing though an obvious illusion is one thing. Not wanting to see despite immense mayhem for countless people is different. Basic cognitive illusion This is: not consciously reckoning with non-conscious, subconceptual mental-neuronal processing. [see: “The Basic Cognitive Illusion”] This illusion is debunked by a lot of scientific data. For instance, [see: “The Post-Postmodernist Brain”] Read the full article…

The Being of Complex Patterns

Being doesn’t give rise to its own being. The being itself is just the being, even if one calls the second being differently — for instance, consciousness. The being of specific complex mental-neuronal patterns (in the brain, to make things simpler) doesn’t give rise to consciousness. They are consciousness itself. This implies that consciousness is Read the full article…

Translate »