What is an Agent?

March 18, 2023 Artifical Intelligence, Cognitive Insights No Comments

An agent is an entity that takes decisions and acts upon them. That is where the clarity ends.

Are you an agent?

The answer depends on the perspective you decide to take.

Since the answer also depends on who is seen as the taker of this decision, the proper perspective becomes less obvious from the start.

Is the you-agent your body, your brain, your mind, or the part of your mind that decides to use your body in order to note down the answer to the question, thereby to answer the question toward me?

Am I the agent who is asking the question?

I would like to believe that.

I also could be a chat robot, writing down the question ― no problem. In that case, I am also seen as an agent, at least in an A.I. development environment.

Let’s go for the robot-me.

In this case, I am a computer or (part of) some software. In any case, the agent-robot-me is the one that can actively change its environment ― such as by asking the above question. Also, the environment can change itself without my doing. There is some independency between me and my environment.

Without independency, there is no agency. I would just be part of my environment, or my environment would be part of me. ‘We’ would together be the agent ― no problem, just good to know.

So, searching for agency in a robot world, one searches for independency and decision-taking.

If my agency as a robot goes in-depth, I become a truly autonomous agent. Of course, we’re not there yet, but what is keeping us from it is no magic.

Now, let’s say I’m a human professional tennis player.

In my brain, a small part is related to my tennis-playing arm. It even has a bit of the same shape. Naturally, I see my arm as part of the me-agent, which is good since even its shape is anatomically present in my brain.

However, one can also see my racket in my brain of a pro. It is anatomically present. Does that make my racket a part of the me-agent? I dare say sometimes it feels that way.

Conclusion

This is just an example to denote that the borders – therefore, the agencies – aren’t obvious. In the human case, we can frequently act as if they are. But even so, in social cases, where are decisions being taken? Can one say one is ‘just following orders?’ Or that one is ‘just following the mainstream?’

In a robot world – which we are entering – things can become much more blurred, if not to say completely impervious. We (who?) can decide to close our eyes to this conundrum. It will then be fully there once we open them.

An agent is where a decision to act is taken, and responsibility originates.

Then comes the learning aspect, in which reward plays a crucial role.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Global Human-A.I. Value Alignment

Human values align deeply across the globe, though they vary on the surface. Thus, striving for human-A.I. value alignment can create positive challenges for A.I. and opportunities for humanity. A.I. may make the world more pluralistic. With A.I. means, different peoples/cultures can strive for more self-efficacy, doing their thing independently and thereby floating away from Read the full article…

Ontologization in Super-A.I.

Ontologization is the process of evolving from subconceptual to conceptual – including subsequent categorization – through attentive pattern recognition and completion. This way, a subconceptual system can form its own ontology. Natural evolution is one example. Artificially, it can be realized in many ways. PRC = Pattern Recognition and Completion. See: the brain as a Read the full article…

Is Compassionate A.I. (Still) Our Choice?

Seen from the future, the present era may be the most responsible for accomplishing the advent of Compassionate A.I. Compassion, basically, is the realm of complexity. It’s not about some commandments or a – simple or less simple – conceptual system of ethics. Therefore, instilling Compassion into a system is not a straightforward engineering endeavor Read the full article…

Translate »