The Double Ethical Bottleneck of A.I.
This is a small excerpt from my book The Journey Towards Compassionate A.I. The whole book describes the why’s, what’s and how’s concerning this.
Getting through the A.I. bi-bottleneck
On the road towards genuine super-A.I. – encompassing all domains of intelligence and in each being much more effective than humans – I see not one but two bottlenecks. This is no guarantee that after the bottlenecks, there will be heaven on earth, but let us suppose now that, from the day after, all will be well indeed.
That enables us to focus on the bottlenecks.
- The first one is human-made. Either rogue or naïve developers may take very wrong decisions. There is a sheer infinite amount of scenarios that one can think about. In the next section, I give a few examples. One may be enough not to need to fear any other anymore. It is the end, my friend.
- The second bottleneck is A.I.-made. On its way towards super-A.I. and beyond, there may be many stages and many changes. Even if the final stage is benevolent, and even if most stages are benevolent, it’s enough for only one stage to be less human-friendly, and we’re gone.
The bi-bottleneck may be quite long with many different stages.
Will humanity be able to control to a sufficient degree everything that can happen?
I think, and repeat, that reliance on control alone will not save us. I also don’t think we should relinquish all control and hope with crossed fingers that A.I. will eventually be Compassionate just like that, after the bottleneck as well as at any stage along. So, we should very well think about control, AND we should think about Compassion. BOTH are indispensable.
I hope that this book will be a wake-up call in this direction.
Related Posts
The Negation Problem in A.I.
Artificial intelligence has learned to play chess, compose music, and diagnose disease. Yet, even today, it still stumbles over a small and powerful word: no. The ‘negation problem’ may seem trivial, but it opens a window into the very nature of understanding. Like Chalmers’ “hard problem of consciousness,” it separates computation from comprehension, logic from Read the full article…
Replacing or Essentially Upgrading People?
It’s often said that “A.I. should not replace people.” This common refrain might obscure deeper issues of human value and purpose in the face of advancing technology. I think the aim can better be worded as “A.I. should not diminish people’s worthiness.” This may entail “A.I. replacing people in their present-day jobs.” If certain aspects Read the full article…
The Generalization Problem in A.I.
Present-day artificial intelligence can impress, surprise, and even outperform humans in narrow domains. Yet again and again, it stumbles when circumstances broaden or change. This blog looks beyond data, scale, and algorithms. It argues that the true generalization problem in A.I. is not technical at heart, but concerns meaning, inner coherence, and depth. This blog Read the full article…