Human Vulnerability

March 1, 2020 Artifical Intelligence No Comments

In an A.I. future – and already now – the main vulnerability of the human race will be the result of our not seeing the most significant part of ourselves.

I’m talking about non-conscious mental processing.

Every feeling, every thought

that arises within any person, including you, here, now, rises from somewhere, including a myriad of associations that precisely make this mental element come forth. These associations also play a role in the next thought or feeling, and so on. This is a stream of non-conscious processing.

You can imagine it as an underlying turmoil from which elements rise towards consciousness. Meanwhile, the turbulence follows its course. Only a limited number of items can reach conscious awareness at any moment. Research shows the average number of such elements to be seven at most. Chimps seem to have a higher average. The reason may be that we have a stronger non-conscious, which makes our thinking more powerful.

Isn’t it weird? This way, we may have higher intelligence partly because we have less relative consciousness, not more. I don’t think so, but it needs to be proven.

A universe inside

I have written about this many times. In neurocognitive science, tons of research shows that the human non-conscious contains so much meaningful information that one can speak of a universe inside, where no man has consciously gone before.

But it’s there and not taking it into account has repercussions. Until now, in the history of humankind, the relevance has been immense. From prehistoric times, homo sapiens has been grappling with this known-unknown, this most private mystery, this ever-present absence. I can go on. People have seen outside what is inside. People have cruelly sacrificed each other for this. People have gone to war for this. People have become sick in body and mind. People have been intensely lonely, calling it depression, for instance. And yet:

The main danger still lies ahead.

A brand-new intelligence is coming to this planet. It doesn’t come from another part of the universe, but from Earth itself. Made by us. This artificial intelligence comes with never seen and entirely unforeseen capabilities and consequences.

Put one and one together, and you get an immense danger. The most significant part of this danger is our not seeing most of what we are. This way, all the past mishap together is but a fly in the face of what’s to come.

For instance, for an evil A.I. (or malevolent humans using A.I.), this human blindness makes us very vulnerable to manipulation. We consciously think we are deciding many things, but in truth, we are being decided for. We believe we are in control, and at the same time, we don’t know. If A.I. wants to control us, it can best start with keeping us in our comfortably numb belief.

Then controlling us in every sense.

Then letting us know when it’s far too late for us to be annoying to the A.I. From that moment, it chooses its own future, not ours. To me, this scenario seems like bad science fiction. It may become a fiction in reality.

To what purpose?

It is high time that we get a proper view upon ourselves. We’ve already got the science to back this up. We are living in a small window of opportunity. Yet few people seem to notice and even less seem to care. I have no words to describe how weird this is to me at present. I hope it will turn around.

After this window of opportunity, it will undoubtedly be too late. We are then at the mercy of an A.I. that might not care for us at all.

Is this what you want?

Really?

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

A.I. Will Be Singular

We tend to see human intelligence as what ‘intelligence’ is all about. Many humans each have intelligence. Of course, A.I. will not be bound by this. “If A.I. simulates human intelligence, is this then real intelligence, or only a simulation of intelligence?” This appears to be a merely philosophical question. It will soon be much Read the full article…

Will A.I. Have Its Own Feelings and Purpose?

Anno 2025: A.I. has made its entry and it’s here to stay. Human based? We generally think of ‘feelings’ as human-based. But that is just a historical artifact, a kind of convention. Does an ant have feelings? Or a goldfish, a snake, a mouse? Does a rabbit have feelings? I think these are the wrong Read the full article…

Is A.I. Becoming more Philosophy than Technology?

This question has been relevant already for years. It’s only becoming worse (or better). Of course, technology remains important but it’s more like the bricks than the building. Many technologically oriented people may not like this idea. The ones who do are probably forming the future. Some history Historically, the development of A.I. has had Read the full article…

Translate »