Darwin and the Brain
Darwin had it right to the core. We (natural evolution) stumbled into a niche of intelligence/knowledge that brought heaven and hell to earth.
We might choose for heaven, but that’s another blog.
Brain stuff
It happens that the human brain has pretty much the same kinds of neurons and the same kinds of brain parts as our animal cousins — in the first place, the big apes.
The starkest difference is that we have bigger brains. Clearly bigger brains.
Size matters, especially in intelligence, whether natural or artificial.
Something missing?
This difference sets us clearly apart as a species. In that sense, we may be excused to temporarily have had the idea of not being animals at all.
But not anymore, as uplifting as the idea may still be to some.
Why not anymore? The missing has been found.
It has been found even multiple times over several years, and increasingly more with the use of DNA analysis.
The difference between us and other animals has also been exaggerated because many ‘missing links’ are not around anymore. ‘We’ (our ancestors) either murdered/competed them out or sexed them in. Otherwise, there would be a bunch of hominids running around.
I wonder what we would do with them now.
Some animals have bigger brains.
Namely, elephants, whales, and some dolphins.
Our advantage to these is naturally having some additional tools that we (evolution) have further developed in brainy interplay.
Masters of exaptation
This way, we got excellent grabbing tools — hands and fingers. We got excellent communication tools — facial expressions and vocal cords. We got a handy upright position.
On top of it all, we got complex social interactions.
None of these have evolved from the beginning to foster intelligence or intelligent behavior. They have been co-opted by emerging intelligence and made into its practical tools. This general process is called ‘exaptation,’ and is no evolutionary exception. We happily used it in our niche.
The lesson of the brain
If nothing else already does, the human brain clearly shows that we are animals. One might see this insight as reductive — the more so if it is (mis)used as such by boiling down each human trait to a simplistic, surface-level explanation. Many resist darwinism not because of the science but the sorry misuse.
Such reductionism does not only denigrate us but the whole animal kingdom. We, animals, are more complex, profound, and interesting than that. At the dawn of super-A.I., it’s about time we recognize this.
Thus, we have to find our dignity elsewhere.
We need to be humble to see how valuable we are. That may take more work than simply assuming we’re so special ‘because,’ but eventually, it’s so much more gratifying.
As a result, we might find our true dignity in Compassion, basically.
Related Posts
Being of Value
That’s what we all are: beings of value. Even of immense value. We should dare to acknowledge that and act accordingly. I know it’s not always easy to acknowledge one’s value. I’ve had my ups and downs in life myself. I’ve also seen people in diverse situations, including in most dire ones where even the Read the full article…
Rationality and Poetry
People are more rational than other animals. More poetic too. Probably we differ more in the latter than in the former. Rationality = taking into account as much as possible elements from reality and linking them together in the most logical way possible in order to generate new knowledge. Poetry = reacting deeply to something, Read the full article…
About Concepts (From My PhD Thesis)
When talking about the ‘subconceptual’ [see About ‘Subconceptual’], it is also important to understand what is meant by ‘conceptual’. This is not a straightforward discussion. According to the classical view of concepts, the definition of a concept is “a proposition that gives a set of individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for being in the Read the full article…