Flower Power vs. Uniform Power
We may need both ― without exaggeration in any.
Flowery power
Each flower is different. Yet none grow into the ground. There is uniformity even in flowers.
Nevertheless, many flowers in a field don’t take advantage of each other’s strength. One danger in being flowery is therefore that each flower is fragile and can easily be trampled upon.
The power of the flower lies in its being alive and able to grow organically. It is part of and contributes to a beautiful world. Fragility is needed to gain this specific kind of flowery power.
The power of uniformity
This is the power of many uniform elements forming a solid bunch. Together, they do take advantage of each other’s strengths.
For instance, an army of uniformed soldiers can act more forcefully. Their uniforms carry the symbolic meaning of also mentally being uniform. Additionally, much practice in marching – uniform direction, rhythm, movements – glues them together even more ― with visible effects in the brain. Soldiers speak about this intense togetherness as a very positive element. Of course, ‘the enemy’ significantly adds to this (with probably also much marching on their side).
One danger of exaggeration in this kind of uniformity – especially in peacetime – is fascism.
So, we have here two pretty different kinds of power.
As human beings, we can combine them.
Even better is a synthesis: one simultaneously being a characteristic of the other and vice versa. Thus, uniformity can contribute to living beauty while aliveness can contribute to the strength of the uniform by diminishing rigidity.
This synthesis is necessary.
For instance, in politics, if flowers just keep being flowery, the vulnerable result may be too weak to build a lasting society. Even more, the weakness may fall into the hardness of the opposite. History shows this is an invitation to fascism. Time and again, its breeding ground is the anxiety of the masses succumbing to the strongman who promises a way out of chaos.
Also without fascism, ultra-right may be seen historically as an allergy to what is perceived as ‘socialist weakness,’ one way or the other. In-depth, this is a reaction of life against the chaos of entropy ― a natural response in an unnatural environment.
The future
I believe it is best to strive for a natural environment in which people can naturally evolve. Proper support may help many to be authentic in this endeavor. For instance, it is crucial in such an environment to learn how to deal with hard and weak from gentle and strong.
The goal lies in sensitivity without heightening vulnerability.
Life!
Related Posts
Meaning is in Dialogue
Meaning may not be a thing, but an event, a living process. Words, books, and memories can preserve traces of meaning, but alive meaning arises only in interaction. This blog explores dialogue as one of the deepest architectures of meaning. There is no meaning without dialogue. That may sound radical at first. Yet it points Read the full article…
Surface wins the moment. Depth wins the soul.
In today’s world of speed and stimulation, surface easily wins attention — but it cannot carry the weight of meaning. This blog explores the silent contrast: where surface culture dazzles the moment, it is depth that nourishes long-term inner growth. Here, AURELIS and Lisa offer not escape from modern life, but reconnection to what makes Read the full article…
About Blurring the Line between Reasoning and Planning
In A.I. research, reasoning and planning are usually treated as if they were separate faculties. Yet in humans, and even more in Lisa, the two constantly weave into one another. This dialogue continues where the addendum of About Reasoning and Planning in Humans and Lisa left off, exploring why the line between them was drawn, Read the full article…