Labyrinthine

December 13, 2022 Cognitive Insights No Comments

Ancient Greek myths frequently have symbolic value ― being about what may happen in the deeper layers of the human psyche.

The Minotaur, half man, half godly bull

This beast – held captive in an elaborate maze or labyrinth by King Minos at Knossos – was fed with human sacrifices from Athens. The Athenian prince Theseus slayed the Minotaur and escaped from the maze through a trick by his royal lover (Ariadne’s thread), whom he later betrayed. Later on, she married the god Dionysos.

Those times weren’t the easiest either.

Symbolism

The Minotaur can easily stand for the deeper self that is hidden, despised, and aggressed and thus becomes ferociously dangerous. Theseus is an Apollonian (conceptual) character who stands opposite to the Dionysian (subconceptual) in his slaying and betraying.

The labyrinth can stand for the difficult path toward the inner mind. Those who get lost perish and are devoured. But Theseus’ cunning plan overcame it all.

So?

Killing the deeper self isn’t a great idea. Perhaps that was why Theseus eventually lost popularity in Athens and was thrown off a cliff ― but not before he caused his father’s death and killed his own son who had raped his wife who hung herself.

Perhaps he should have been more friendly to the Minotaur?

I guess so.

That doesn’t mean the Minotaur should have gotten his way feeding on living human sacrifices chosen from Athens’ most beautiful boys and virgin maidens.

This labyrinthine story has many quirks. Why this? Why that? Why not?

That, indeed, is the complex tale of human depth.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Against Reductionism

The present carries a danger of reductionism in several domains: mind to body, total self to ego, a kaleidoscope of social diversity to identity politics, or worse. These might be signs of a broader reductionism that seeks to make individuals more controllable by erasing their inherent complexity but thereby undermining the richness of human experience Read the full article…

Contemplation vs. Thinking

Thinking and contemplation are two distinct ways of engaging with the world. Thinking is structured and task-oriented, moving from thought to thought with clarity and precision. Contemplation, by contrast, is thoughtless, inviting a deeper connection to the essence of things. While both are essential, contemplation reaches the core of who we truly are, providing insights Read the full article…

Schizoid Thinking

Schizoid thinking is characterized by detachment from immediate reality, allowing for abstract, imaginative, or emotionally distant thinking. It often involves withdrawing into one’s inner world to explore thoughts and ideas that are not bound by present, external circumstances. Gentle Caution: Before diving into this discussion, it’s essential to recognize that schizoid thinking, while a natural Read the full article…

Translate »