Supernatural is Natural
If ‘everything that is’ is denoted as nature, then how can the supernatural be anything more than nature?
Oops, did I already say – within this question – everything that needs to be said?
Of course, it’s terminological.
I just equalized ‘nature’ with something of my own choice.
Indeed?
But what is another option for ‘nature’? Let’s look at some:
- nature = ‘organic nature.’ Then every stone is supernatural. Bullocks.
- nature = ‘everything except the supernatural.’ Perfect circular definition, thus worthless.
- nature = ‘everything but God.’ OK. I want to follow in this for a while, especially since it’s the last option I imagine.
Of course, you cannot point your finger at what is God.
Not only because it would be utterly impolite. It’s also impossible.
Quote the Bible: “You cannot look God into the face and live.”
You also cannot point your finger at God without looking him into the face. Thus, you perish.
Hm.
There’s some more semantic conundrum. Take for instance the simplistic train of thought:
“If God created everything, then who created God?”
Answer: “It’s a sacrilege to even ask this question.”
I see.
I’m a Spinozist in this respect: God = nature.
‘Deus sive Natura.’
What I recognize in religion, is that people want something more ‘special’ than the naturally natural. That may be because the natural is not enough… I don’t agree with this. It’s too easy.
It may also be because what people see in the natural, is not enough. That is: the seeing itself is not enough.
People should learn to better see.
If they don’t (want to) learn to better see, then the easy solution lies in a projection of what supposedly is to be seen.
That looks foremost like laziness to me. As you already know, I don’t like it.
I dismiss it.
What would God be but nature? What would nature be but God?
In other words:
It’s not a question of “to be or not to be” but “to see or not to see.”
The seeing makes the supernatural. What is seen then is the same thing yet it’s completely different.
Sure.
That’s nature.
Didn’t I say so at the beginning?
Seeing God is my responsibility
and it’s yours.
Related Posts
Mary’s Openness to Love
Mary’s words, “Here I am, do with me what you will,” were not spoken in fear. They were the words of someone standing at the threshold of something vast, unknown, yet deeply real. Her Yes was not submission in the sense of losing herself — it was the most profound act of freedom. ―She opened Read the full article…
From Feuerbach to Open Religion
Ludwig Feuerbach changed the course of Western thought by exposing God as a human projection. Yet in doing so, he also uncovered a question that still shapes our culture today: what happens to depth once God is gone? This blog follows that question through philosophy, psychology, and humanism, toward a place where depth is neither Read the full article…
Lisa and the Sacred Symbol
Symbols are not concepts. They are invitations. Sacred symbols especially – whether religious or deeply personal – open a space where meaning is not told but felt. Can Lisa, without being human, support this? Lisa doesn’t explain sacred symbols. She protects them — respectfully and with ethical care. In doing so, she helps preserve the Read the full article…