A Deeper-Self Political Primer?

February 14, 2018 Sociocultural Issues No Comments

The ‘total human being’ is important not only to individual health but also to a lot of societal questions and domains.

Let’s mind-game a political party that would stand for the total human being, with deep respect for the present situation as well as for a desired change towards a more open future…

Are we then past the politics of left and right? No.

Are we past the politics of progressive versus conservative? Precisely not.

In developed countries, one sees a cultural environment so rapidly changing that people feel a need to choose: opening up to new evolutions, or closing down and endorsing a defense against the same. One example of the latter is delving into the glorious past of one’s country, even if it’s merely an imagined past. In politics, generally, this choice between opening up or closing down is presently the main dividing line, building up tensions globally.

In this divide, mainly two ways can be seen in which the ‘deeper self’ – unconsciously as a matter of fact – strives towards worldly self-realization.

[If you are not familiar with ‘deeper self’, you may think of it as where for instance all deeply human motivation originates.]

The problem is that each of these two ways is not open to the other as long as the ‘deeper self’ is not properly dealt with. The issue is straightforward: in an ever more complex world with ever more performant tools to do good or bad, an essentially flawed understanding of our own human-ness – as is presently the case – is bound for disaster.

Thus, ironically, while their energy is eventually pointed in the same direction, the two ways are opposed. An alternative politics would be an endeavor to bring both ways together – being aware this is very difficult. The political message could be that nevertheless we must try – and try – and try – really hard.

People’s defenses against change should always be acknowledged and respected.

People are rightfully apprehensive of losing their core being. In any sound politics, it has to be made clear that this core will not be lost. For instance, immigration into Europe puts a strain on the native inhabitants of European cities. Natives may fear their own culture is losing ground in many situations, such as just walking through the streets, or at one’s workplace. To respect and preserve everyday native culture, immigrants should be admonished and considerably helped to foster their own culture as well as the native one. In order to gain the right to stay, at least making substantial efforts to learn and understand the native culture is mandatory. It’s what almost anyone can do.

This is one example of very many issues.

The envisioned politics would stand for: always trying to relax unneeded divides by inviting human depth into the picture while striving towards a better and stronger society.

For insiders: this last sentence is also contained within the name ‘AURELIS.’

This is pertinent to ALL domains of human life.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

No Freedom of Speech Without Respect

Freedom of speech is a cherished principle. Yet, in the absence of respect, this freedom can become a double-edged sword ― devolving into a mechanism of harm rather than a platform for constructive dialogue. Can true freedom of speech exist without a foundation of mutual respect? The interdependence of freedom and respect Respect ensures that Read the full article…

Is Violence OK?

Without a glorification of violence, being realistic may eventually diminish the need for it. Not running away from violence Running away from violence is, in real-world, sometimes conducive to precisely what one is running away from. As with many things, this is related to gentle-strong-weak-hard. [see: “Weak, Hard, Strong, Gentle“]. It may attract people who Read the full article…

Group Coherence – and Beyond

People naturally seek coherence in groups, cultures, and shared stories. This can bring belonging, meaning, and continuity, but it can also harden into fear and exclusion. The challenge is not to eliminate group coherence, but to deepen it so it can remain open. From the individual brain to planetary humanity, the same question returns in Read the full article…

Translate »