Nothing religious without depth<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Anything purely conceptual \u2013 clear characteristics, crisp boundaries from other concepts \u2013 can be crystal clear but cannot have human depth<\/a> since the latter precisely needs distribution over many other concepts in different respects. Depth is fuzzy, sometimes at the brink of chaos in meaningful ways.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One may believe it will rain tomorrow, but that is no religious belief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One may believe that \u2018God exists\u2019 without being religious by far \u2015 no depth, no religion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I wonder how much religious belief truly exists this way.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n It cannot be investigated straightforwardly. The question \u2018Do you believe?\u2019 can in principle be answered very differently in view of the above dichotomy, even while the believer sincerely deems himself religious. How is he to know that the experience may be pretty different for others?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, how am I to know \u2015 or you?<\/p>\n\n\n\n