Crucial in many situations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Criminal recidivists, sex offenders, psychopathic leaders, people with addictive thoughts and behavior\u2026 all these may be seen as in need of self-controlling their negative urges. Many may not want to; others do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To have a good society, we need at least a good idea about self-control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lack of self-control is not a disease<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n There is no simple cause or set of causes, and there is no simple cure or set of cures. Seeing it as some disease is using the wrong metaphor. Lack of self-control is not like a black spot that should be carved out with a knife-like product or procedure (called \u2018therapy\u2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n In contrast to this, organic growth is a better metaphor. Lack of self-control should be outgrown. It needs respect \u2013 yes, for the lack \u2013 as one nurturing element for growth. Where does the lack come from? What does it mean to the specific person? Does it even deserve the term \u2018lack of\u2019?<\/p>\n\n\n\n The image of the iceberg<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You probably know this image: 15% above, 85% below sea level. It can be used to visualize conscious versus non-conscious processing in the human mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Or, as I prefer, talking about the distinction between conceptual and subconceptual processing, with the additional twist that what reaches above sea level is the continual result of what happens below. In this image, subconceptual patterns continually crystallize towards conceptually clear conceptual thoughts, which are therefore also more prone to be in conscious awareness \u2015 being above sea level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Who controls whom?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Apparently, in self-control, someone controls someone. However, logically, nothing can control itself. Something moves, or it doesn\u2019t. Direct self-control is an impossible bootstrapping. There needs to be a who controlling another who.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, does the top of the iceberg control what lies underneath? That doesn\u2019t fit well with my implication that the top is the result of what it is then supposed to control. This makes the control question a really weird one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, are we all acting out of control all the time?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You might hope I say \u2018No\u2019 now, but I don\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fortunately, that doesn\u2019t make things hopeless. I mean, we are only out of a-kind-of-control that we think we have. Let\u2019s call this \u2018superficial control.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n The other control<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The kind of control we have can then be called \u2018deep control\u2019 to make the difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For this, it becomes crucial to see the distinction between above and below sea level. It\u2019s not all ice. In other words, there is a fundamental difference between conceptual and subconceptual processing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The above emerges from the below. Symbolically, it is part of the below. The below exists at near-chaos where such emergences are possible and natural like a whirlpool can naturally emerge from quickly flowing water.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trying to control the whirlpool (superficial) without controlling the water (deep) is impossible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another view on the human being<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The conundrum comes from a view on the human being that is highly ingrained in Western, if not global, society, with only the above-sea being considered. Thus, the idea of \u2018control\u2019 is also put mainly above sea level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AURELIS view is very different and, I dare say, much more science-based. According to this view, merely superficial control is not the answer<\/a>, even though conceptual psychotherapy is frequently based on heightening superficial control<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Practical consequence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The AURELIS view doesn\u2019t make control irrelevant<\/a>, of course, only \u2013 very \u2013 different. Inhibition (of bad urges) is replaced by human mental growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In short, one may need to let go of some superficial control \u2013 even when there is little being felt to start with \u2013 in order to gain deep control. This letting-go can be challenging while it\u2019s about something less clear that comes in place of something clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is about autosuggestion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Is that enough for any effectiveness? Let\u2019s just say that the use of autosuggestion can take a lot of work. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Depending on what one wants to accomplish, which mental patterns one wishes to see changed, AurelisOnLine sessions<\/a>, for instance, need to be done correctly and patiently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AURELIS is all about providing the needed support to make autosuggestion work for you and by you.<\/p>\n