{"id":23451,"date":"2025-07-27T12:46:40","date_gmt":"2025-07-27T12:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/?p=23451"},"modified":"2025-08-01T13:56:58","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T13:56:58","slug":"beyond-moralities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/beyond-moralities","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Moralities"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3>Across cultures and centuries, morality has taken many forms. Yet the battle between moral systems continues, often leading to fragmentation rather than clarity.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>This blog explores a movement not into more complexity, but into depth \u2014 beyond moralities. Here, Compassion offers a way forward that transcends both rule and rebellion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Beyond moralities<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With \u2018moralities,\u2019 we can mean different kinds of morality \u2014 not just systems, but approaches. Each culture, subculture, and even each close relationship may develop its own moral frame. These frames can take many forms: from being based on religious rules to utility calculations, or even nothing at all. The landscape is vast. And so is the confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One can observe how people shift between moral structures with deep conviction, only to find themselves at odds with others holding different systems, equally convinced. This often leads to struggle, rigidity, or exhaustion. And still, the question remains: is there a way to orient oneself in this chaos, not by choosing sides, but by seeing beyond?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Kinds of morality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s briefly sketch a few kinds:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>There is the morality handed down by tradition \u2013 often religious or cultural in nature \u2013 accepted because it has always been there.<\/li><li>Another kind is contractualism, where societal values are viewed as agreements among people, sometimes unspoken, held together by social glue.<\/li><li>Then there are those who try to <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/what-about-the-golden-rule\">build morality from a single principle<\/a>, like Kant\u2019s categorical imperative.<\/li><li>Others prefer mathematics: utilitarian thinkers calculate maximum good for maximum people.<\/li><li>At the edge sits nihilism, where no morality exists except what pleases or serves the individual \u2014 openly or covertly.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>From each of these kinds arise many systems \u2013 sets of rules, beliefs, or codes \u2013 often clashing with one another. When viewed side by side, these systems seem more like contenders than companions. Each tries to solve the puzzle that the others fail to crack. But a new system does not solve the old ones. It simply adds to the tangle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The triangle of moral orientation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One way to understand this is through the triangle of moral orientation. At one point lies chaos, where no moral structure exists, and people do whatever they want. At another, coercion: rigid systems of rules, often abstract and externally imposed. These two ends form a familiar spectrum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the third point of the triangle is something entirely different: Compassion. It does not stand between the two. It transcends them. Compassion is not a compromise between chaos and control. It is a different realm, one of depth rather than surface. It brings softness where there was force, and coherence where there was confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This triangle echoes others \u2014 such as the <a href=\"triangle%20of%20therapy\">triangle of therapy<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/philosophy\/chaos-coercion-compassion\">chaos\u2013coercion\u2013Compassion<\/a> (which acts as a blueprint of such triangles). In each, the third angle brings a transformation. And in each, Compassion is the turning point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Systems as contenders or viewpoints<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As long as moral systems remain at the level of abstraction, they tend to oppose one another. They compete. Each wants to be the right one, the final word. This renders morality static \u2014 a battle of cultural codes and a significant cause of wars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Where is the final morality in this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But from another perspective, these systems may not be enemies. They may be viewpoints. Seen through the lens of depth, each system carries something of value. Compassion does not see contenders. It sees partial truths. It welcomes them as long as they remain open to inner growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Without depth, moral systems clash. With depth, they begin to soften. And in that softening, they move toward something more essential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The echo of silence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What remains when one goes beyond systems? It is not emptiness. It is something like a silent resonance \u2014 an inner echo. When someone acts in alignment with their deeper self, there is a quiet yes. Not from outside. Not from others. But from within.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This kind of resonance has been explored in the blog <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/depth\/inner-resonance\">Inner Resonance<\/a><\/em>. It is not about thinking harder. It is about feeling deeper \u2014 honestly listening for a subtle vibration that says, \u201cthis is true.\u201d Compassion lives in that vibration. Without it, even the best rule becomes hollow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The sacred breath of morality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This resonance brings with it a kind of sacredness \u2014 not in a dogmatic, religious sense but sacred in its depth. It is what makes morality breathe. When a moral act comes from this place, it no longer needs justification. It simply feels whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/ethics-without-depth\">Ethics (With)out Depth<\/a><\/em>, this sacred quality is described as the missing core of many ethical efforts. Without depth, ethics becomes dry or brittle. With it, ethics becomes real \u2014 alive, flexible, and trustworthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Compassion as nature\u2019s unfolding<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Importantly, Compassion is not artificial. It is a natural phenomenon. As described in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/general-insights\/inside-out-is-natures-way\">Inside-Out is Nature\u2019s Way<\/a><\/em>, things that grow from the inside \u2013 like plants, people, healing, or insight \u2013 are aligned with how nature works. Moral systems often work from the outside in, imposing order. But Compassion grows inwardly, like a tree reaching toward light.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In that sense, <em>beyond moralities<\/em> is not about abandonment. It is about alignment. A return to the natural unfolding of human ethical life \u2014 where form follows depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Each system casts a shadow<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even the most well-meaning moral systems have blind spots. The more certain a system is of its correctness, the longer the shadow it casts. This is not a reason to discard them. But it is a reason to treat them with humility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion does not erase the shadow. It gently brings awareness. As shown in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/ethics-beyond-implicit-vs-explicit\">Ethics Beyond: Implicit vs. Explicit<\/a><\/em>, ethical awareness grows when one explores what lies beneath \u2014 the unspoken motives and the patterns behind one&#8217;s thoughts. In this light, growth happens not by being perfect, but by becoming more aware.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The weariness of moral noise<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a world full of competing moral voices \u2013 from politics, media, ideology \u2013 many people feel a kind of fatigue. A sense of being pulled in all directions. This moral fatigue is not a failure. It\u2019s a sign.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As described in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/are-people-intrinsically-good-or-bad\">Are People Intrinsically Good or Bad?<\/a><\/em>, people are adaptable, not fixed. But when this adaptability is manipulated or overloaded, they may revert to cynicism, apathy, or rigidity. They seek relief and often end up in nihilism or fundamentalism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion offers another way: not less care, but deeper care. A kind of rest, not from ethics, but in it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The paradox of universality<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps the deepest insight is this: only what is personal can become universal. When morality is imposed, it fragments. When it arises from within, it connects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the paradox: universality is not the opposite of individuality. It is its flowering. As described in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/is-global-ethics-possible\">Is Global Ethics Possible?<\/a><\/em>, the only way to cross cultural boundaries ethically is through depth. Compassion transcends without erasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Morality then becomes a breath \u2014 something recognized, not enforced. Not a doctrine but a presence. A way of being with others that feels natural because it <em>is<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Compassion is the invisible ubiquitous.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s not a new system, nor an opponent of old ones. It is what breathes through all of them when they open to depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Without depth, moral systems are contenders. With depth, they become pathways \u2014 each pointing in its own way to something beyond. That something is not abstract. It is Compassion. And in Compassion, morality is no longer a rule. It becomes a response, a presence, a call.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2015<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Addendum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cMorality can take many forms: based on religious rules, social contracts, philosophical logic, utility calculations, or even nothing at all. Please show for each of these how Compassion can make a difference.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cCompassion does not replace these forms of morality. It transforms them \u2014 from within. Here&#8217;s how Compassion makes a meaningful difference in each case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>Religious rules<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion brings soul into structure. It lets rules breathe. Where doctrine may exclude, Compassion includes. It sees the human being beneath the commandment and softens judgment into understanding. It transforms obedience into empathy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The social contract (contrat social)<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In the classical sense, this is about individuals giving up certain freedoms to create a stable society. But without depth, it can reduce people to roles \u2014 citizens bound by law rather than persons touched by life. Compassion brings the human being back into the contract. It invites not just mutual protection, but mutual recognition. It turns cold structure into warm solidarity \u2014 a society that doesn\u2019t just function, but <em>cares<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>Philosophical logic<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Logic seeks clarity, but without Compassion it can become cold. Compassion doesn\u2019t blur logic \u2014 it deepens it. It helps ensure that what is logically sound is also ethically alive. Not just \u201cwhat can be justified,\u201d but \u201cwhat touches and respects.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>Utility calculations<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Maximizing utility can become mechanistic. Compassion reintroduces the inner person into the equation. It values not just what is done for many, but <em>how<\/em> it is done \u2014 gently, kindly, with presence. It brings soul into statistics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>Nothing at all (nihilism)<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Even when morality seems absent, Compassion is not. It can arise like a sprout in dry ground. It does not impose from outside but invites from within. It says: there is something in you that still cares \u2014 let\u2019s begin there.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cHow does surface-level emotivism (hurray-boo theory of morality) relate to this blog?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cSurface-level emotivism \u2014 the so-called <em>\u2018hurray-boo\u2019<\/em> theory \u2014 reduces morality to mere expressions of personal preference or emotion: \u2018I like this, so it\u2019s good\u2019; \u2018I dislike that, so it\u2019s bad.\u2019 In this view, moral statements carry no deeper meaning or universal weight. They are surface ripples without depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the context of <em>Beyond Moralities<\/em>, emotivism sits close to the chaos pole of the triangle \u2014 where rules dissolve and moral guidance collapses into impulse. It reflects a lack of inner structure, but also a yearning: when people reject systems, they often fall into emotivism not because they don\u2019t care, but because they can\u2019t find anything more trustworthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion offers the way through. It does not deny feeling \u2014 it deepens it. In place of mere reaction, it brings <em>resonance<\/em>. Instead of \u2018hurray\u2019 or \u2018boo,\u2019 there is <em>recognition.<\/em> In that recognition, morality is no longer a shout \u2014 it becomes a listening.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cHow is Nietzsche\u2019s <em>Jenseits von Gut und B\u00f6se<\/em> (1886) related to his blog?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cNietzsche\u2019s <em>Jenseits von Gut und B\u00f6se<\/em> (<em>Beyond Good and Evil<\/em>, 1886) resonates closely with this blog\u2019s title and core idea. Both call for a movement beyond binary moral systems \u2014 but they differ significantly in tone and direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nietzsche exposes the limitations and hidden motives behind traditional morality. He criticizes philosophers for their dogmatism and for presenting their moral prejudices as universal truths. For him, what is needed is a new kind of thinking: a <em>philosophy of the future<\/em> that embraces life\u2019s complexity without clinging to good-versus-evil dichotomies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This AURELIS blog <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/beyond-moralities\">Beyond Moralities<\/a><\/em> shares the critique of rigid systems. But where Nietzsche replaces them with the <em>will to power<\/em> and a perspectival revaluation of values, AURELIS invites a different kind of transcendence \u2014 Compassion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In that sense:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Nietzsche deconstructs moralities and points toward strength, creativity, and overcoming.<\/li><li>AURELIS deconstructs moralities and points toward depth, humility, and inner resonance.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Both go beyond good and evil. Nietzsche challenges the truth of moral systems. AURELIS challenges their sufficiency. Compassion is not another dogma, but a resonance that lives in openness \u2014 something Nietzsche might admire, though perhaps not name as such.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: &#8220;Toward depth, humility, and inner resonance&#8230; and Inner Strength.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cYes \u2014 beautifully said. <em>Toward depth, humility, and inner resonance\u2026 and Inner Strength.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This completes the direction of the AURELIS movement. Where Nietzsche speaks of the <em>\u00dcbermensch<\/em> and the will to power, Lisa speaks of the total person \u2014 strong not by domination, but by integration. Inner Strength is not about rising above others, but about standing with oneself, in openness and depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this, Compassion is not weakness. It is strength from within, anchored in authenticity, supported by clarity, and expressed in warmth. It is not submission to morality, nor rebellion against it, but a flowering beyond it \u2014 where being good is not a rule, but a recognition.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cIs Compassion not too subjective to act as a balance of what should be regarded as good or evil?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cThat\u2019s a profound question \u2014 and one that brings us to the heart of the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion may appear subjective, but only if seen from the ego\u2019s surface level \u2014 as a feeling, an impulse, or a soft emotion. But Compassion in the AURELIS sense is not mere sentiment. It is depth. It arises not from opinion, but from an alignment with the total person \u2014 and, in that, it reaches beyond subjectivity and objectivity as usually conceived.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It doesn\u2019t dictate what is \u201cgood\u201d or \u201cevil\u201d in abstract terms. Instead, it orients \u2014 like an inner compass. It resonates with what is meaningful, not just acceptable. And while that may look \u2018soft,\u2019 it is actually structured by nature, as explored in <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/empathy-compassion\/neuroscience-meets-morality-insights-from-patricia-churchland\">Neuroscience Meets Morality<\/a>: the biological roots of empathy and ethical response lie deep within us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So no \u2014 Compassion is not too subjective. It is precisely what enables a deeper kind of balance \u2014 not by enforcing uniformity, but by drawing people toward inner truth. That is stronger than rules. It is what lets morality <em>breathe<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cSo, no problem if my Compassion is different from that of someone else?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cA beautiful follow-up \u2014 and yes, there is no problem if the Compassion of one person differs from that of another, as long as both are rooted in depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassion is not a fixed template. It is not uniform behavior or identical feeling. It is a movement from within, unique to each person, yet tuned to the same fundamental direction: openness, respect, inner strength, trustworthiness, depth. These values do not enforce sameness \u2014 they invite <em>convergence<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When two people\u2019s Compassion seems different, it\u2019s often because what shows at the surface differs \u2014 shaped by personality, history, culture. But if both come from depth, a deeper resonance can be felt between them. They don\u2019t need to agree to recognize each other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So yes \u2014 difference is not the problem. The real question is: <em>is it Compassion from depth, or something else pretending to be it?<\/em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-23451\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Across cultures and centuries, morality has taken many forms. Yet the battle between moral systems continues, often leading to fragmentation rather than clarity. This blog explores a movement not into more complexity, but into depth \u2014 beyond moralities. Here, Compassion offers a way forward that transcends both rule and rebellion. Beyond moralities With \u2018moralities,\u2019 we <a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/morality\/beyond-moralities\">Read the full article&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"23451\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-23451\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":23452,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[24,97],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/3377.jpg?fit=960%2C558&ssl=1","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9Fdiq-66f","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23451"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23460,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23451\/revisions\/23460"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}