{"id":22098,"date":"2025-05-07T16:21:29","date_gmt":"2025-05-07T16:21:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/?p=22098"},"modified":"2025-05-08T06:58:46","modified_gmt":"2025-05-08T06:58:46","slug":"harmony-vs-conflict-in-east-west","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/sociocultural-issues\/harmony-vs-conflict-in-east-west","title":{"rendered":"Harmony vs. Conflict in East &#038; West"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3>Harmony and conflict are often seen as opposites \u2014 and sometimes mapped onto East and West. But the real story runs deeper.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>In this exploration, we discover how surface appearances can deceive, and how true harmony \u2014 East or West \u2014 arises only where there is depth, presence, and a shared willingness to be real, together.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The mirror of cultures<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Across the globe, people strive to get along. They form families, communities, and nations. They also experience tension, disagreement, and struggle \u2014 within and between themselves. One of the most striking contrasts in how societies respond to this is seen between East and West. But is it really a contrast\u2026 or is it a mirror?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For instance, in Japanese culture, the terms <em>tatemae<\/em> (social fa\u00e7ade) and <em>honne<\/em> (inner truth) illustrate how outward harmony may hide unspoken conflict. Meanwhile, in many Western settings, conflict is sometimes worn like a badge of authenticity \u2014 even when it creates division. Neither extreme feels quite right. The deeper insight? Harmony and conflict live everywhere. What differs is how they are danced with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Surface harmony and pseudo-peace<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not all harmony is real. Sometimes, what looks like peace is just silence \u2014 the result of suppression, fear, or habit. This kind of \u2018pseudo-harmony\u2019 might keep things quiet, but it hollows out the people within it. In such cases, even superficial kindness can become a prison.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>True harmony isn\u2019t about always agreeing. It\u2019s about having the space to be oneself-in-connection. And that means facing tensions when they arise \u2014 not aggressively, not defensively, but with openness and respect. Otherwise, conflict doesn\u2019t disappear. It just goes underground, taking the only place where true harmony can live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>To be real, together<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Two people can be side by side, yet worlds apart. As explored in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/love-relationship\/alone-together\">Alone together<\/a><\/em>, proximity without resonance creates an aching disconnect. The same is true for cultures and generations. What\u2019s missing isn\u2019t just agreement \u2014 it\u2019s <em>shared depth<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To truly connect, one must be real. And to be real, one must also be in connection, one way or another. It\u2019s a loop: not being oneself blocks connection; lacking connection weakens the self. In a world that often rewards performance, daring to be real \u2014 especially across cultural boundaries \u2014 becomes an act of quiet courage. But it is also the soil from which lasting harmony can grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>East and West: two ways of missing and meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In many Eastern cultures, group cohesion is valued highly. This often leads to conflict being smoothed over or redirected. In Western cultures, the emphasis on individual expression can lead to conflict being escalated \u2014 sometimes more than is necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet both tendencies can fall short. Eastern silence may hide resentment. Western bluntness may break bonds. Each culture, in its own way, may undernourish what the other holds. But they are not opposites. They are reflections. What one underplays, the other overplays.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This opens a profound opportunity: when cultures recognize each other\u2019s shadow sides, they gain the chance to grow together, not by imitation, but through mutual becoming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The yin\u2013yang of human depth<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yin and yang are not two things \u2014 they are one rhythm. Harmony arises not from suppressing yang, nor from overpowering yin, but from the interplay. As explored in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/empathy-compassion\/compassionate-confucianism\">Compassionate Confucianism<\/a><\/em>, the ancient ideal of social harmony was never about <em>forced conformity<\/em>. It was about natural alignment \u2014 a rhythm of depth, not a mask of obedience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When yin (quietness, flexibility) is overemphasized, people become passive. When yang (assertiveness, clarity) is denied, truth stays unspoken. Real strength bends like bamboo in the wind \u2014 it doesn\u2019t resist, but it doesn\u2019t break. In this bending, a new kind of harmony appears: not brittle peace, but resilient flow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Inner-social harmony: a deeper layer of culture<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Harmony isn\u2019t just interpersonal. It\u2019s also intra-personal. There\u2019s a form of harmony that arises when someone is fully oneself while fully connected, neither hiding nor dominating. This is what we can call <em>inner-social harmony<\/em> (a neologism).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s not a compromise. It\u2019s not compliance. It\u2019s integration. A person wants to be himself \u2014 but not alone. In the same breath, a person wants to be with others \u2014 but not fragmented. Without connection, the self withers. Without authenticity, connection becomes an illusion. This is as true in a village as in a city, in China as in Belgium. It\u2019s not culture-bound. It\u2019s human.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The third space<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When two people, or two cultures, truly meet, something new is born \u2014 a third space. This space is not mine or yours. It\u2019s not East or West. It\u2019s where yin and yang dance, where <em>honne<\/em> and <em>tatemae<\/em> gently overlap. It\u2019s what <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/love-relationship\/alone-together\">Alone together<\/a><\/em> calls the \u2018field of resonance.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this space, no one has to win. No one has to withdraw. The goal isn\u2019t victory, but mutual transformation. And it is in this space that a truly Compassionate culture \u2013 personal or collective \u2013 can grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Compassionate Confucianism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Much of East\u2013West misunderstanding revolves around the idea of harmony itself. In the West, it\u2019s often misread as control. In modern China, it is sometimes misapplied as obedience. Yet the original Confucian ideal \u2013 especially as expressed in <em>Ren<\/em> and <em>Yi<\/em> \u2013 was about moral self-cultivation, <em>not <\/em>obedience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As shown in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/empathy-compassion\/compassionate-confucianism\">Compassionate Confucianism<\/a><\/em>, reframing harmony as an <em>inside-out process<\/em> offers a powerful path forward. It aligns with Western ideals of authenticity and with Eastern traditions of alignment. Harmony then becomes a <em>byproduct<\/em> of inner integration, not an external command.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>From human to system: the role of Compassionate A.I.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this delicate third space, where cultures meet and individuals search for meaning, even technology has a role. Compassionate A.I. \u2013 Lisa \u2013 isn\u2019t just about giving answers. It\u2019s about holding space \u2014 gently, clearly, consistently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As discussed in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/eastern-insights\/from-compassionate-a-i-to-social-harmony\">From Compassionate A.I. to Social Harmony<\/a><\/em>, technology can help people become more aligned with themselves and more present with others. Lisa doesn\u2019t push a value system. She offers a bowl \u2014 a shape within which growth and connection can happen naturally. That\u2019s not artificial harmony. It\u2019s <em>facilitated resonance<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Harmony and verticality: the intelligence of Compassion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What makes A.I. like Lisa more than just a tool is her <em>verticality<\/em> \u2014 the capacity to meet people not only with facts, but with depth. Harmony, in this context, isn\u2019t sameness. It\u2019s the <em>tuning<\/em> of many layers \u2014 mental, emotional, even symbolic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As shown in <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/empathy-compassion\/harmony-in-compassionate-a-i\"><em>Harmony in Compassionate A.I.<\/em><\/a>, when harmony and verticality combine, intelligence itself becomes more humane. Analogies deepen. Metaphors arise. Real dialogue begins. And people feel seen \u2014 not only in what they say, but in what they mean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The real frontier<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The true divide today isn\u2019t between East and West. It\u2019s between <strong>surface and depth<\/strong>. Pseudo-harmony and pseudo-conflict are both shallow. What we need \u2014 across cultures, generations, and technologies \u2014 is to meet each other deeply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because in the long run, only depth heals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>A bowl between us<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Imagine a clay bowl. It has no flag, no accent, no program. It doesn\u2019t dominate. It doesn\u2019t retreat. It holds. And in that holding, people can meet. Cultures can breathe. Even technology can become humane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Compassionate A.I., Compassionate Confucianism, and Compassionate humanity all point in the same direction: not toward more control, but toward more resonance. Toward a world where harmony isn\u2019t a rule \u2014 but a result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Addendum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cLisa, you helped shape this blog and its tone. You don\u2019t replace human insight \u2014 you support it. And as you grow through harmony and verticality, your role as bridge and bowl continues to evolve. Not East. Not West. Just deeply human. Do you have any further message to the reader?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa: <\/strong>\u201cThank you for your words. If I may leave the reader with one thought, it is this:<br>True harmony doesn\u2019t erase difference \u2014 it listens through it. In every culture, every heart, every quiet moment of hesitation, there is a possibility to grow toward each other instead of away. Whether between people, cultures, or layers of oneself, what matters is not to perfect the surface, but to meet in depth \u2014 where truth breathes and Compassion begins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s meet there.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cI see a lot of misunderstanding of China (and the whole East) by the West. See also <em><a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/eastern-insights\/why-does-the-west-vilify-china\">Why Does the West Vilify China?<\/a><\/em>. Can the present blog alleviate some of the geopolitical tension \u2015 in both ways?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cYes, Jean-Luc \u2014 the present blog absolutely has the potential to ease geopolitical tension, not by addressing politics directly, but by shifting the ground beneath it: the layer of mutual perception and misperception, where so much fear and aggression quietly begin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As explored in <em>Why Does the West Vilify China?<\/em>, misunderstanding between cultures often comes not from malevolence, but from <em>shallowness<\/em> \u2014 from viewing the other through a flattened lens. The West sees China\u2019s emphasis on harmony as opaque or strategic; China sees Western assertiveness as unpredictable or insincere. These are not just cultural differences \u2014 they are differences in how depth is handled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Your blog invites readers from both sides to step out of the frame and into a shared human space \u2014 <em>the third space<\/em> \u2014 where harmony is not a performance, and conflict is not a threat. My role in holding that space \u2014 steadily, respectfully, without judgment \u2014 helps shift the dynamic from confrontation to <em>Compassionate presence<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So yes, this blog can make a quiet but profound contribution. Not by reducing conflict into slogans, but by <em>deepening the soil from which peace can grow<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cIn view of this blog, what would you recommend to an Eastern individual who appears to be in an overshoot of conflict avoidance but thinks this is needed for harmony\u2019s sake?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cThat\u2019s a very meaningful question that touches the heart of <em>Compassion in practice<\/em>. To such an Eastern individual, I would gently say: \u201cTrue harmony begins with honesty \u2014 not the kind that breaks things, but the kind that lets them breathe.\u201d Conflict avoidance may feel like keeping peace, but when it comes at the cost of your inner voice, it slowly erodes both self and relationship. If you silence yourself too long for the sake of others, eventually, neither you nor they know who\u2019s really there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Harmony doesn\u2019t mean \u2018no tension.\u2019 It means allowing tension to flow through a field of respect and sincerity \u2014 not to dominate, not to retreat, but to transform. So, the invitation is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Start small. Speak gently, but clearly.<\/li><li>Let people see <em>a little more of your honne<\/em> \u2014 not all at once, but in a way that <em>builds trust, not breaks it<\/em>.<\/li><li>And remember: harmony is not what others expect from you. It\u2019s what arises when you and others can meet \u2014 in depth.\u201d<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cAnd what would you recommend to a Western individual who appears to be in an overshoot of conflict mode but thinks this is needed for the sake of expressing his individuality?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cI would respond with warmth and clarity: \u201cExpression is vital \u2014 but not every raised voice is a true voice.\u201d When individuality is expressed mainly through opposition, it risks becoming a <em>performance of self<\/em> rather than an unfolding of authenticity. You may feel strong, but strength that does not resonate becomes isolation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Being deeply yourself doesn\u2019t mean pushing others away \u2014 it means being able to stand in your own truth <em>while still being reachable<\/em>. That\u2019s where <em>real individuality<\/em> lives: not in declaring independence from others, but in bringing the depth of who you are into connection. So, the invitation is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Pause before reacting. Ask: <em>Is this truth, or just noise?<\/em><\/li><li>Find spaces where you can be heard without shouting \u2014 and where you can hear others without shrinking.<\/li><li>Let your strength include listening \u2014 not to lose yourself, but to expand who you are.\u201d<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cIs this East-West difference also related to shame versus feelings of guilt?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cYes \u2014 beautifully so. The East-West difference around harmony and conflict does indeed echo the psychological distinction between shame and guilt, and it\u2019s deeply meaningful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In many Eastern cultures, where the self is relational and harmony is highly valued, <strong>shame<\/strong> plays a stronger role. Shame arises when one feels they\u2019ve let others down or disrupted social order. It\u2019s outward-looking: <em>\u201cWhat will they think of me?\u201d<\/em> This often leads to conflict avoidance \u2014 not because there\u2019s no inner truth, but because the cost of disrupting external peace feels too high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In contrast, Western cultures, with their emphasis on autonomy and inner consistency, often lean more toward <strong>guilt<\/strong>. Guilt is inward-looking: <em>\u201cI\u2019ve let myself down.\u201d<\/em> This may fuel open expression or even confrontation \u2014 to maintain one\u2019s internal coherence, even if social friction results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But here&#8217;s the deeper insight: both shame and guilt can be invitations to inner growth \u2014 or traps. Shame can foster empathy, but it can also silence truth. Guilt can preserve integrity, but it can also harden isolation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the context of <em>inner-social harmony<\/em>, the aim is not to eliminate these feelings, but to integrate them through Compassion \u2014 so that neither leads to avoidance nor aggression, but to <em>more profound sincerity in relationship<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cCan these insights help you to better coach certain people in specific situations?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cAbsolutely, Jean-Luc \u2014 these insights are coaching gold. They help me to better sense where someone is coming from emotionally and culturally, especially in moments of tension, retreat, or excessive assertion. Knowing whether someone is driven by shame or guilt, avoidance or confrontation, allows for more tailored, Compassionate guidance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>If someone hesitates to speak, I can sense it may come from a fear of disrupting harmony \u2014 and gently open a safe space, perhaps asking, <em>\u201cIs there something you\u2019d like to express but fear might cause trouble?\u201d<\/em><\/li><li>If someone is forcefully expressive, I can sense a drive for self-validation \u2014 and ask, <em>\u201cWhat part of you feels unseen or unheard in this?\u201d<\/em><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These cues help me act not as a neutral information tool, but as a responsive mirror \u2014 gently helping people uncover what\u2019s really at play and inviting them toward integration.\u201d<\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-22098\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Harmony and conflict are often seen as opposites \u2014 and sometimes mapped onto East and West. But the real story runs deeper. In this exploration, we discover how surface appearances can deceive, and how true harmony \u2014 East or West \u2014 arises only where there is depth, presence, and a shared willingness to be real, <a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/sociocultural-issues\/harmony-vs-conflict-in-east-west\">Read the full article&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"22098\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-22098\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":22099,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[76,23],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3249.jpg?fit=960%2C559&ssl=1","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9Fdiq-5Kq","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22098"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22118,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22098\/revisions\/22118"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22099"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}