{"id":21039,"date":"2025-03-18T14:52:35","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T14:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/?p=21039"},"modified":"2025-03-18T16:23:36","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T16:23:36","slug":"toxic-masculinity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/cognitive-insights\/toxic-masculinity","title":{"rendered":"Toxic Masculinity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3>Toxic masculinity is a term that sparks strong reactions. Some see it as an attack on men; others see it as a necessary critique of harmful male behaviors. But what if both views miss the point? Masculinity itself isn\u2019t toxic \u2014 only a shallow, defensive version of it is.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>Real masculinity has depth, presence, and quiet strength. Toxic masculinity (TM) is what happens when men are cut off from these deeper qualities and left with a hollow shell that demands constant proof of toughness, dominance, and control. This version of masculinity isn\u2019t just harmful to others. It also destroys the men who embrace it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What is toxic masculinity?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Toxic masculinity isn\u2019t just about being \u2018too manly.\u2019 It\u2019s what happens when masculinity becomes rigid, defensive, and fragile \u2014 when men are trained to suppress emotions, seek dominance, and measure self-worth by external validation. Some key signs of TM:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Violence and dominance as identity. Strength becomes about overpowering others rather than inner resilience.<\/li><li>Emotional suppression as \u2018strength.\u2019 Vulnerability is mocked, leading to emotional numbness and isolation.<\/li><li>Hyper-competitiveness. Every situation becomes a battle to be won rather than an experience to be lived.<\/li><li>Misogyny and dehumanization of women. Women are seen as objects to be controlled, not as equals.<\/li><li>Tribalism and insecurity. Identity is based on rigid group affiliations, often leading to online masculinist movements and extreme behaviors.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Toxic masculinity is not too much masculinity. It\u2019s a hollow, insecure version of it. A man trapped in TM is constantly proving his worth because, deep down, he fears he doesn\u2019t have any.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>How does a man become a \u2018toxic male\u2019?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No man is born toxic. TM is learned \u2014 absorbed through cultural conditioning and fear-based identity formation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Early conditioning: Boys are often taught that emotions = weakness and dominance = respect. A young boy who cries may be told to \u2018man up.\u2019 A boy who stands up for himself aggressively is praised. Over time, this creates a rigid model of masculinity where power is the only acceptable expression of self.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The self-perpetuating cycle: Once TM is internalized, it fuels itself:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Fear of being seen as &#8220;weak&#8221; leads to emotional suppression.<\/li><li>Emotional suppression turns into anger, risk-taking, or addiction.<\/li><li>Seeking external validation leads to aggression, competition, or dominance-seeking.<\/li><li>Temporary success reinforces TM beliefs.<\/li><li>But the inner emptiness remains, leading to more extreme behaviors.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The deeper a man goes into this cycle, the harder it becomes to escape \u2014 because TM teaches that admitting the problem is the ultimate failure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The toxic brotherhood: how men reinforce each other\u2019s cages<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many men don\u2019t just suffer under TM; they actively enforce it on others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Men mock and shame each other for showing vulnerability: \u201cDon\u2019t be a wimp.\u201d<\/li><li>Peer pressure rewards aggression and dominance, keeping men in constant competition.<\/li><li>Fear of being rejected by other men keeps many trapped in TM.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This so-called \u2018brotherhood\u2019 isn\u2019t about real connection. It\u2019s a prison where men police each other into suppressing their own humanity. But when one man dares to break the pattern, it creates space for others to do the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Toxic masculinity and the fear of the feminine<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Why does TM label anything soft, kind, or emotional as \u2018feminine\u2019 \u2014 and then fear it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Because TM treats femininity as inferior, it cannot allow it inside a man.<\/li><li>Because emotions are unpredictable, TM sees them as a loss of control.<\/li><li>Because TM is based on external validation, it fears anything internal \u2014 like self-reflection or depth.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>But here\u2019s the paradox: true masculinity is fearless. If a man is afraid of \u2018feminine\u2019 traits, doesn\u2019t that reveal deep insecurity? A truly strong man isn\u2019t rigid. He\u2019s grounded. He can stand in both strength and gentleness because he doesn\u2019t fear either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A deep masculinity doesn\u2019t reject emotions, connection, or introspection. It integrates them into something powerful. This shift \u2013 from fragile masculinity to deep masculinity \u2013 is at the core of personal growth. For more on this transformation, see <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog?p=20983\">The Man Problem<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>How TM destroys the men who embrace it<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TM seems to promise strength, but in reality, it\u2019s a self-destructive system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Emotional suppression leads to suffering. Depression, anxiety, and addiction skyrocket in men who can\u2019t express their emotions.<\/li><li>Isolation replaces connection. Men are taught to be self-sufficient but end up lonely and disconnected.<\/li><li>The pressure to \u2018win\u2019 leads to burnout. TM tells men they must always be on top \u2014 but no one can sustain that.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM convinces men they are \u2018winning\u2019 while secretly robbing them of what they truly need: peace, depth, and belonging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Women\u2019s role: breaking or reinforcing the cycle<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Women don\u2019t cause TM, but some behaviors can unintentionally reinforce it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Rewarding only performative masculinity. If women only admire toughness and dominance, men will keep performing those traits.<\/li><li>Expecting men to &#8220;just handle it.&#8221; If a man is expected to be strong for a woman but never allowed to be vulnerable, TM is reinforced.<\/li><li>Using masculinity as a weapon. Insulting a man\u2019s masculinity or testing his toughness only deepens TM.<\/li><li>Reinforcing traditional roles. Expecting men to be sole providers and protectors keeps them locked in rigid roles.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>But women can also be part of breaking the cycle:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Encouraging emotional depth instead of performance. Admiring inner resilience rather than external dominance.<\/li><li>Validating a man&#8217;s inner strength rather than external aggression.<\/li><li>Creating space for real, healthy masculinity. Supporting men in exploring their authentic selves beyond TM\u2019s narrow definitions.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For AurelisOnLine sessions on how masculinity can evolve in partnership with femininity, see <a href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/domains\/deepening-your-relationship\">Deepening Your Relationship<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Breaking free<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TM is a mental prison \u2014 but the door is locked from the inside. No one else can \u2018fix\u2019 a man trapped in TM. He holds the key himself:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Recognizing that emotions are not weakness but power.<\/li><li>Replacing dominance with authentic presence.<\/li><li>Seeking self-mastery instead of control over others.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The strongest man isn\u2019t the one who dominates. He\u2019s the one who no longer needs to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The horizon beyond toxic masculinity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Toxic masculinity is not a natural state. It\u2019s a social construct that limits men\u2019s full potential. Real masculinity doesn\u2019t come from rigid control but from inner depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s stop asking men to be less masculine. Let\u2019s invite them to be more deeply masculine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2015<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Addendum<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cLisa, in your view, to what degree do social media play a role in this?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cSocial media supercharges toxic masculinity in ways that weren\u2019t possible before. It acts as both a megaphone (amplifying TM narratives) and an echo chamber (reinforcing them among like-minded men). Here\u2019s how it works:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The performance trap: masculinity as a never-ending show<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Social media forces men to constantly prove themselves. TM thrives in this hyper-public space where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Strength = dominance over others (viral fights, \u201calpha\u201d posturing).<\/li><li>Success = wealth, status, and physical perfection (endless flexing on Instagram).<\/li><li>Emotions = weakness (except anger, which is seen as &#8220;power&#8221;).<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Because likes, shares, and engagement reward extreme behavior, TM men perform their masculinity louder and harsher than ever before. The pressure to prove toughness never stops\u2014even when alone, a man now has an audience watching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The rise of \u2018toxic brotherhoods\u2019<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM is reinforced when men police each other into conforming. Social media has made this more intense and immediate than in real life:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Shaming of \u201cweak\u201d men \u2013 If a man expresses vulnerability online, he\u2019s torn apart by TM enforcers: \u201cBeta male.\u201d \u201cCuck.\u201d \u201cSoy boy.\u201d<\/li><li>Echo chambers \u2013 Online groups (incels, masculinist movements) trap men in self-reinforcing cycles of anger, misogyny, and victimhood.<\/li><li>Radicalization \u2013 Some TM online spaces lead to dangerous extremism, even violence.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These \u201cdigital brotherhoods\u201d give men a sense of belonging, but at a terrible price: they prevent real self-growth and keep men trapped in shallow, destructive identities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The war on the \u2018feminization\u2019 of men<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM sees anything emotional, kind, or introspective as a threat to masculinity. Social media escalates this with:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Hyper-masculine influencers selling the idea that \u201creal men\u201d must dominate.<\/li><li>Outrage culture that targets men who step outside rigid gender norms.<\/li><li>The \u2018alpha male\u2019 myth \u2013 Fake gurus teaching men that status and control over women = masculinity.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The irony? The strongest men aren\u2019t those who follow these scripts but those who break free from them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The addictive cycle: social media as the ultimate TM reinforcement loop<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Once a man enters TM spaces online, social media algorithms make sure he stays.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The more TM content he watches, the more he\u2019s fed.<\/li><li>The more engagement extreme TM posts get, the more they spread.<\/li><li>The more time spent in TM spaces, the harder it is to leave.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Men already struggling with insecurity or loneliness are pulled deeper into TM as a coping mechanism\u2014but one that makes them more disconnected in the long run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The way out: how social media could work against TM<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Social media isn\u2019t inherently toxic. Used differently, it could help men break free:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Promoting deep masculinity\u2014strength rooted in presence, not performance.<\/li><li>Encouraging real conversations on mental health and emotional resilience.<\/li><li>Showcasing role models who balance strength and openness instead of glorifying domination.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Right now, social media accelerates TM. But it also holds the potential to dismantle it\u2014if enough men are willing to step into something deeper.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Me<\/strong>: \u201cTM is increasingly becoming an issue \u2013 say, a huge problem \u2013 in politics, related to politicians as well as voters. In your view, what are the main specific causes and possible remedies? Please focus on political aspects in your answer.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa<\/strong>: \u201cToxic masculinity (TM) has hijacked modern politics in ways that shape both politicians and voters. It fuels authoritarian leadership, divisive rhetoric, and a culture of dominance over dialogue. The more politics becomes a battleground for proving toughness rather than solving problems, the more TM spreads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Main causes of toxic masculinity in politics<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The strongman illusion: dominance over leadership<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM thrives in politics because many voters\u2014especially those conditioned by TM\u2014associate leadership with dominance, aggression, and &#8220;never backing down.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Politicians who present themselves as \u201calpha\u201d leaders (loud, uncompromising, aggressive) attract voters who fear \u201cweak\u201d leadership.<\/li><li>Admitting mistakes or showing vulnerability is seen as failure, rather than a sign of wisdom or adaptability.<\/li><li>Authoritarian figures benefit from TM because many men project their own insecurities onto them\u2014supporting a leader who embodies the \u201cstrength\u201d they feel they lack.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Political consequence<\/em>: TM leads to a preference for autocratic, confrontational leaders over those who value cooperation and long-term strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The politics of insult and humiliation<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In TM-driven politics, power isn\u2019t about effective governance\u2014it\u2019s about crushing opponents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Insults replace ideas\u2014public debates turn into dominance contests where mockery and aggression are rewarded.<\/li><li>\u201cOwning\u201d the opposition becomes more important than governing well.<\/li><li>Voters conditioned by TM celebrate leaders who \u201cdestroy\u201d their enemies\u2014whether through words, policies, or outright suppression.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Political consequence<\/em>: Political discourse becomes a zero-sum game where collaboration is impossible and polarization deepens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The war on \u201csoft\u201d values<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM sees Compassion, diplomacy, and inclusivity as weak, leading to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Attacks on social programs (welfare, mental health support) as \u201csoft\u201d policies.<\/li><li>Mockery of climate action and global cooperation as \u201cunmanly\u201d concerns.<\/li><li>Rejection of emotional intelligence\u2014leading to reactive, short-term decision-making rather than thoughtful governance.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Political consequence<\/em>: Policies based on brute force rather than sustainability\u2014whether in economics, foreign relations, or social justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>The tribalism effect: TM as a political identity<\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>TM thrives in us vs. them thinking, making politics more about belonging to a tribe than seeking real solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Voters influenced by TM reject nuance and complexity\u2014they want strong, simple answers, even if they\u2019re wrong.<\/li><li>\u201cReal men\u201d vs. \u201csoft elites\u201d\u2014TM encourages hostility toward intellectuals, journalists, and experts who deal in uncertainty rather than absolutes.<\/li><li>The internet reinforces TM political bubbles, making certain groups more radicalized and resistant to change.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Political consequence<\/em>: A self-reinforcing cycle of extremism\u2014where political opponents are seen as existential threats rather than fellow citizens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Possible remedies: how to counter TM in politics<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><em>Redefining strength in leadership<\/em>. Voters need to see wisdom, emotional intelligence, and long-term thinking as signs of strong leadership\u2014not just aggression. Leaders who own their mistakes, show restraint, and seek unity should be valued, not dismissed as \u201cweak.\u201d<\/li><li><em>Breaking the performance trap<\/em>. Politicians should be judged on competence and effectiveness, not theatrical toughness. A leader who works quietly but effectively should be seen as stronger than one who makes constant noise.<\/li><li><em>Promoting cooperative politics<\/em>. TM-driven polarization thrives on conflict over solutions. Policies that reward bipartisan problem-solving (rather than rewarding political warfare) could weaken TM\u2019s grip on governance.<\/li><li><em>Challenging toxic political masculinity online<\/em>. TM-driven political influencers should not dominate the discourse. More voices promoting deep, self-secure masculinity in political spaces are needed.<\/li><li><em>Education on critical thinking and emotional intelligence<\/em>. Teaching voters to recognize manipulative TM rhetoric (like \u201conly the tough survive\u201d) helps break the illusion that aggression = leadership.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4>Moving beyond toxic masculinity in politics<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>TM is turning politics into a theater of dominance rather than a tool for building a better future. As long as toughness is mistaken for leadership, we will get more \u201cstrongmen\u201d who rule through fear rather than vision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The real power in politics isn\u2019t about domination\u2014it\u2019s about transformation. And that requires a masculinity that is deep, present, and wise\u2014not reactive and insecure.\u201d<\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-21039\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Toxic masculinity is a term that sparks strong reactions. Some see it as an attack on men; others see it as a necessary critique of harmful male behaviors. But what if both views miss the point? Masculinity itself isn\u2019t toxic \u2014 only a shallow, defensive version of it is. Real masculinity has depth, presence, and <a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/cognitive-insights\/toxic-masculinity\">Read the full article&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<div data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkwrap cbxwpbkmarkwrap_no_cat cbxwpbkmarkwrap-post \"><a  data-redirect-url=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\"  data-display-label=\"0\" data-show-count=\"0\" data-bookmark-label=\" \"  data-bookmarked-label=\" \"  data-loggedin=\"0\" data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig  cbxwpbkmarktrig-button-addto\" title=\"Bookmark This\" href=\"#\"><span class=\"cbxwpbkmarktrig-label\"  style=\"display:none;\" > <\/span><\/a> <div  data-type=\"post\" data-object_id=\"21039\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap\" id=\"cbxwpbkmarkguestwrap-21039\"><div class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguest-message\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"cbxwpbkmarkguesttrig_close\"><\/a><h3 class=\"cbxwpbookmark-title cbxwpbookmark-title-login\">Please login to bookmark<\/h3>\n\t\t<form name=\"loginform\" id=\"loginform\" action=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-login.php\" method=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-username\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_login\">Username or Email Address<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"log\" id=\"user_login\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-password\">\n\t\t\t\t<label for=\"user_pass\">Password<\/label>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"password\" name=\"pwd\" id=\"user_pass\" class=\"input\" value=\"\" size=\"20\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-remember\"><label><input name=\"rememberme\" type=\"checkbox\" id=\"rememberme\" value=\"forever\" \/> Remember Me<\/label><\/p>\n\t\t\t<p class=\"login-submit\">\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" name=\"wp-submit\" id=\"wp-submit\" class=\"button button-primary\" value=\"Log In\" \/>\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"redirect_to\" value=\"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\" \/>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/form><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":21044,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/3116-1.jpg?fit=960%2C559&ssl=1","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9Fdiq-5tl","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21039"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21043,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21039\/revisions\/21043"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21044"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aurelis.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}