Concerning mental and psycho-somatic issues<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Psychotherapy<\/em> carries the connotation of being pointed toward strictly mental problems. Contrary to this, although seemingly hazier, mental growth<\/em> has broader applicability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Many practitioners of somatic medicine wouldn\u2019t like the association of \u2018mental growth\u2019 with medicine, let alone their field of expertise. The solution is to separate the domains within the practitioner\u2019s standpoint, bringing them together within the standpoint of the cared-for. The medical practitioner can advise his patients to take care of this other side \u2015 while definitely not being within his medical expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This will not detract from medicine but make it much more genuine and, indeed, scientific.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mental illness under scrutiny<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Not well known by the general public \u2013 or even many psychotherapy practitioners \u2013 the concept itself of mental illness lies under intense scrutiny. In top-research, the debate has even largely been abandoned, the consensus being that mental illness as a concept has little to no internal validity. This is, within the extensive enumeration of mental illnesses (DSM-V) lies no natural kind concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Much effort goes into the search for an alternative. For this to succeed, probably much more profound issues must be solved, such as a different stance towards non-conscious mental processing<\/a> and a clear choice to transcend the placebo<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Arguably, this will make the whole domain of psychotherapy more mental growth-oriented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AURELIS is a growth philosophy.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n So, naturally, it goes in the second direction. Moreover, you recognize Inner Strength<\/a> in the last two letters of the name.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One doesn\u2019t need to be ill to use AURELIS. Even more, the concept of illness is not intrinsically relevant to the AURELIS project. Therefore, there is no diagnosis or therapy for any \u2018illness.\u2019 The term, if used at all, explicitly only serves convenience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lisa<\/a> follows in this vein. Coincidentally, this naturally widens the applicability of Lisa very much. Moreover, it brings Lisa\u2019s way of being closer to the concept itself of intelligence. This is the promise of Compassionate A.I., which I have written extensively about in my book The Journey Towards Compassionate A.I.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n As to the science<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Mental growth should be profoundly within the scientific domain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As a matter of fact, at present, it is not. I believe the profound cause lies in the (culturally) badly digested distinction between the conceptual and the subconceptual. Western science has chosen the former for historical reasons while pushing away the latter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Poetically said, the inside versus outside the poem<\/a> needs to be reconsidered. Human depth may be absent<\/a> from most present-day conceptual science. Meanwhile, much is happening within neurocognitive (conceptual) science that will undoubtedly change the picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mental growth doesn\u2019t belong forever in an alternative swamp vs. a colorless ivory tower<\/a>. It should be taken seriously in a combination of rationality and depth, which is, as you may know, the USP of AURELIS.<\/a><\/p>\n