Especially important for understanding this text is knowing what I exactly mean by Compassion<\/em>. Please make sure to read Compassion, Basically<\/a> before going further.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The mind in healthcare<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Compassion is crucial for psychotherapy because of conceptualized methodologies\u2019 little (or no?) effectiveness<\/a>. What openly <\/em>works in psychotherapy is non-specific<\/a> \u2015 not conceptually distinct in methodology. Because the open<\/em> aspect is incompatible with the quintessential placebo<\/a> (the \u2018dummy pill\u2019), this leaves the therapist-as-total-person as the primary effective factor.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The same applies to anywhere the mind is relevant in healthcare, including psychosomatics and mental coaching. This indicates a future of mental healing<\/a> in which Compassion plays a central role. In psychotherapy, the notion of the exceedingly effective \u2018therapeutic wizard\u2019 probably points to this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What Compassion is not \u2015 although it may seem to be.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The following distinctions are not straightforwardly clear to all, even foregoing semantic issues. One may need to delve into related complexities:<\/p>\n\n\n\n All three are interesting and worthy by themselves. Nevertheless, in my sense of using the concepts, only Compassion optimally reaches the ability to help many people \u2015 including oneself. This is even more the case in an environment where people actively come to seek help.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Compassion is art and science.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Science brings together Compassion and subconceptual processing<\/a> in the mind\/brain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See: Is Compassion Art?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Although everyone can put some steps in art or science, a long and winding path can be travelled in both directions. Without disrespect, many deem themselves to be further on one of them (or both) than can be conceivably acknowledged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is even more the case with Compassion pointing to Eastern Enlightenment. In this regard, one may see oneself on a ladder of Enlightenment. For sure, there is a progression of human growth. Without it, no striving would make any sense. But the actual worthiness is in the striving itself, much more than in the place on the ladder. You may recognize a higher-up by his modesty, as in not showing where he stands unless this helps you. Otherwise, he\u2019s just the guy on a bus (or a Himalayan monastery).<\/p>\n\n\n\n How do you know where you are on this ladder? You don\u2019t. Even so, one not seldomly encounters the following assertion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCaregivers are already Compassionate by nature.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hm. For one who likes the symbolism, Buddha-nature<\/a> might be present in every sentient being but realizing it \u2013 making it effectively real \u2013 is a different matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What is present in many is hardly the end of the path. It is not even necessarily on the path. Even \u2018helping people\u2019 in the sense of \u2018me helping you\u2019 can be very ego-oriented in the \u2018me\u2019 and the \u2018you.\u2019 Since Compassion does not occur without ego-transcendence, that kind of \u2018helping people\u2019 is not the subject of this text.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Note that Eastern Enlightenment is not seen as something easy but the result of much hard and long work of meditation and building insight. There is some rightful disdain for anxious easy-goers<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Eastern concept of Emptiness<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Grasping Emptiness<\/a> (with capital C) at least a bit is beneficial in this regard. It is, in a fundamental sense, the opposite of being conceptually empty (little c) although it may help to \u2018empty the teacup.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, this puts one in a meditative direction. With proper support, this is interesting for any healthcare provider, for whom it can make a huge difference<\/a> in East and West alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Support?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In my view and experience, it is possible to support people in cultivating Compassion. I see two directions of support:<\/p>\n\n\n\n AURELIS procedural support toward Compassion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n This needs to be taken with a huge dose of prudence. The above distinctions (empathy, altruism, love) are painstakingly important. Also, any ego will see any instrument as its own for use. The fundamental aim is the contrary: not the ego-using, but the ego-being-used \u2015 respectfully and with the clear message that ego-humility is necessary. That\u2019s the deal. The ego should be an open gate, not a closed door.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you are ready for this deal, you can read about some AURELIS coaching techniques<\/a>. Even so, please see them as nothing but invitations for you to grow from the inside out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you experience this, and you feel ready to grow towards an AURELIS coach<\/a>, please let us know.<\/p>\n